State:
on 4/11/07 MM murdered his wife . . . .cold-calculated murder rely on knowledge & experience . . . . his fingerprints are all over this.
You will not be instructed to check your common sense @ the door - trial is about the truth not about games or gotcha moments between Atty's, it's about the truth and justice.
Motive is not an element the State is required to prove . . . explains why he did it - to get rid of Michelle in his own way = tells you why he killed his wife.
11/05 def & Gypsy meet on line - relationship turns sexual shortly - sometime he also had an affair with Anna. On 3/6/07 relation turns very serious - someone asking Gypsy out on a date - she declines his offer to meet and go out - I've looked forward to meeting you but a best friend of mine has recently become much more than that - Martin M.
a week later another exchange online - Gypsy responds to another email . . . I met him online 1.5 yr ago - friendship too good to tempt fate - I went back to dating other people but just recently his views and reasoning changed and we are together now. He was a married man with beautiful wife and family - but things changed.
Gypsy said their relationship was casual. The date of Michelle's death was just like any other day. Offensive her attempt to protect defendent - lets call a spade a spade - she minimized anything about the relationship and her knowledge.
actions speak louder than words - gypsy and martin relationship speak
gypsy could simply give us what we could prove thru other means - the tip of the iceburg. She moved into . . . he paid rent, gave her money and credit cards - casual relation I ask?
2 or 3 weeks after Michelle death - Gypsy moved in as nanny - it was clear she was that nurse he was looking for a place for.
find gypsy number on that cell - confirm 3 calls on 3/20 8:46, 8:47 and later that eve @ 5:41.
Picture of Michelle displayed in court
