Oh, but he’d have to pay some sort of alimony and/or divide the property! He’d have to spilt custody of his child.
He didn't make that much money, the only way they could afford that house was based on selling a property on Long Island, imo. It would have been a huge drop in living standard.
It's a good question, but I am not sure what kind of forensics would take a year and a half to come back, especially in a case like this that, one would assume, is fairly high-priority. Anyone have any thoughts? Of course, "new evidence" could mean what Juliana has recently offered up.
From the article:Trial set Feb 3 but could be pushed back, defense is still waiting on 8 terabits of data from the prosecution.
This does not necessarily mean there is no plea deal forthcoming. There may or may not be. Until the actual deal is finalized (if there is to be one) and the plea is entered in court, the prosecution cannot be expected to say anything but "full speed ahead." Plea deals often fall apart before they become final.
I don't think these men care about custody but about splitting money, control and not paying support. They could barely afford the big house on their salaries and then only bc of owned property on Long Island that was sold prior to the move to VA. May have needed to downsize to an apt or condo if divorced. That lifestyle would not have had the same appeal to the chesty young gfriend IMOO.
Yes the "striking flesh" bit is puzzling--not only that she supposedly could hear it but that somehow she was able to identify the sound (unless she had observed or overhead many knife assaults over the years).Was pleasantly surprised to see the latest indictment and charges in the case against the husband BB. All seems so unnecessary. And as others have said, the poor child of CB and her husband.
One thing really caught my eyes…… the au pair describing the knife as ‘striking flesh’ or words to that effect. And IIUC she is giving that analysis from being in a different room from the stabbing event? I don’t recall that from earlier. So maybe that is new? But even more disturbing IMO, hearing that type sound? And describing it that way? Not saying it is impossible to ‘hear’ from a distance…… but suspicion is the au pair was standing in the room watching the events. Based on that description?
Will be interested in what other evidence and information becomes available. And also seems the au pair best get an attorney separate from her ‘lover’, sever all ties to him, and try to offer evidence? And why would her attorney move to suppress evidence? IANAL. MOO
Yes and agree, but IMO from what is now reported or known, the whole thing cannot be pinned solely on BB. IIRC the au pair has admitted to being requested to obtain a second gun and enjoin in the slaying(s). And I fully agree her description of the slaying says IMO either she has experience with such, or was watching the event unfold. And it seems the two were ‘hitched at the tip’ early in the planning and execution of their plan. These two, the au pair and BB IMO deserve each other. As to the lawyer and who is paying or representing whom I withdraw any further concerns expressed about that after reading and reflecting further. MOO
