Okay Folks, I made my comments after careful thought. I have not judged or jumped on you guys, but some of your comments and facts are one sided and not totally factual. Secondly I don't appreciate some of your comments. My comments were made in an effort to reduce the snippiness, and it seems they did not do that. First: I can't tell what shoes were on JY at CB or at HI. Some have translated something that might be HP to they are the HP. Secondly, JY bought a pair of HP 1.5 years before this murder. SA Morrow admitted there was not sufficient detail to make a comparison of the shoe print to the shoe (assuming it was available for comparison). The broad class characteristics appeared to be those of three shoes marketed by HP, one of which was the Orbital which JY bought. The size of the print could have been a 12, but PT's expert admitted it could have been a size belor or above. It is good evidence, but it isn't the smoking gun that is implied when you can't conclusively put those shoes on JY at CB or HI. Better resolution on the images could help, then I would know. Don't blame the DT for problems with Gracie. LE could have helped her testimony by searching harder for verification from the unknown witness. And even SA Tart was exposed for his judgement of Gracie's testimony. Hey I admit she may have seen JY but I refuse to put a man away for life when there are admitted memory disabilities in the key witness. It seems that some of you would judge her differently than the DT's witnesses. Again, these are my opinions. Respect my right to them, and I promise you I will not judge you for your differences.