I have been reading and researching and trying to stay as objective as possible but I have some what if's-if anyone can shed some light on these: 1. Everyone keeps talking about a time-line when the 911 call was placed but whose to say that everything wasn't staged prior to the 911 call. 2. What if it was Darin that inflicted the wounds on Darlie (explains the inner arm bruising and neck slashing that had to have been done with the left hand) he may have done this to A. Either protect her after he came downstairs after hearing the attacks and saw that she did this or B. He was the intruder and since it was dark and she was half asleep she did not notice him and he could not go through with killing her after the kids (less plausable) 3. Is it not possible that you could sleep through the murders if it was late (fell asleep in front of the TV (TV noise in background) with 2 kids that were killed in their sleep (they would not make any noise if they were sleeping and the blows were quick) it's not like using a bat or something else that would make loud noises. I know that I am a light sleeper when it comes to my kids moving around or coughing in the next room but there are times that I can sleep right through a loud thunderstorm and not even know that it had rained the night before. 4. I listened to the 911 tape and the operator said FIRST don't touch anything and Darlie responded after this that she already touched the knife. She did NOT volunteer out of the blue that she had touched the knife. She sounded hysterical on the tape and every other word was 'oh my God' repeated in between explaning what was going on -she did not know CPR and I would have been on that phone trying to get someone to help my kids that knew how to save them also. 5. The intruder did not leave blood going out of the house because the kids were laying down and any blood would have soaked and spread down the chest sides to the floor -like if you layed down and poured water over your chest and at that time there was no trail of blood it was concentrated where they were laying- Darlie had blood on her night shirt because she had leaned over the boys to help them and the little one was standing after and she was also bleeding and moving around to the kitchen and back dripping and trailing and walking making prints- Prior to her being up the intruder was in front of her leaving there was a clean path until she came from behind etc. The big major question I have is 'why did she get wet the towels'???? wouldn't you get dry towels to soak up the blood and stop the bleeding and not waste time getting them wet? The only reason I can think she wet them was to either 'clean' the scene to cover up evidence or because she was way shallow and didn't want a mess. How many of you wet towels when someone is bleeding? These are all just thoughts I had if anyone can shed any light on them at all. I really am torn between innocence and guilt on this. Thanks.