OK guys, A kind of philisophical question for you guys. (And mods I am new so if this question doesn't belong here then I am sorry please move it). I need to preface this question. A lot of Criminal Defense attorneys have stated that they don't think that ICA will get convicted of First Degree Murder. Now a lot of people may disagree here but this is coming from a lot of seasoned criminal defense attorneys (even Jose Baez, okay that was a joke). See for example Patrick Barbary, Brad Conway and indeed Richard Hornsby. I tend to agree subject to one caveat I have stated previously: Casey Anthony does not have the most experienced and skilled attorneys (and I have restrained myself here to try and comply with TOS). I believe that the evidence probably is not enough to convict of FDM because regardless of what happened it does not prove ICA committed FDM beyond and to the exclusion of reasonable doubt. However, she may well be convicted because of poor representation. So regardless of the legal issues, if Casey Anthony (or anyone for that matter) is convicted for a crime that they did commit but the state would not have got a conviction had it not been for the fact that the Defendant had representation, has justice been done?