Userid, So presumably you accept Coroner Meyer's reasoning why he thinks JonBenet was wiped down? For the case you make to be valid you have to know that there is blood on another exterior area of JonBenet's genitals. Coroner Meyer reports no such residue of blood. So what you are saying is that there was both a wiping down event and an additional deposit of blood event, both independent of each other. Would Coroner Meyer been aware of this possibility when he concluded that JonBenet had been wiped down, since the blood stain arriving after Jonbenet has been wiped down invalidates his reason for concluding she had been wiped down? So Coroner Meyer who was present at the autopsy has got it all wrong, and you who knows the distribution of JonBenet's underwear in space, yet was absent from the autopsy has got it all right? Again you repeat yourself and contradict the basis for Coroner Meyer arriving at his conclusion that JonBenet was wiped down: e.g. Autopsy, verbatim extract You said: I'm claiming she was wiped down after being dressed in the size-12's, because Coroner Meyer thinks the bloodstain on the size-12's and the absence of blood on her genitals allows him to conclude she was wiped down, i.e. she was wearing the size-12's when she was wiped down. Other counterfactual events notwithstanding, I'll stick with Coroner Meyer's interpretation, after all, he conducted the autopsy. .