Why Am I The Only One Asking

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by Barbara, Jul 13, 2004.

  1. Barbara

    Barbara New Member

    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I think it is pretty obvious by now that the topic of Gilgax' name being made public has caused quite the stir.
    There are the factions that think it is terrible that his name was made public.

    There are the factions that are just plain envious that they didn't get it first for either personal pride or for profit

    There are the factions that are applauding the fact that his name is out there, putting a stop to any profit being made on his information, and hoping that this will get some attention and we can put this man's name to rest one way or the other (I'm in this group BTW)

    Now we have the second listed faction above who are taking great delight in finding fault with Tricia for doing this because.....

    1. this is an "active investigation",
    2. Now he knows they are looking at him
    3. Tricia posted information that IS NOT MEANT TO BE KNOWN DUE TO THE INVESTIGATION!!!!!!!!!!

    Why isn't anyone asking why and HOW Tracey was able to get hold of this information and make a f***ing documentary all about this guy?
    He got to know where he lived, who his family is, what he does, HIS NAME, HIS NAME, HIS NAME, HIS NAME, HIS NAME

    His records, his date of birth, his friends, and everything else about this case and this man's whole life story. Tracey is nothing but a journalist, and a two bit journalist at that!

    WHY ISN'T ANYONE INQUIRING WHO GAVE ALL THIS INFORMATION TO TRACEY AND IF IT IS SUPPOSEDLY "LEGITIMATE" INFORMATION, WHY DOES TRACEY HAVE IT????

    WHY WAS TRACEY GIVEN ALL THIS INFORMATION AND ALLOWED TO MAKE A TELEVISION SHOW ABOUT HIM, MAKE A PROFIT, MAKE A NAME FOR HIMSELF?????

    AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE CHOSEN TO BELIEVE JAMESON THAT SHE HAD ALL THIS INFORMATION, I WOULD ASK: WHY DOES AN ORDINARY CITIZEN HAVE ALL THIS INFORMATION???????????????

    SHE IS NOTHING BUT A CITIZEN. WHY WAS SHE GIVEN ANY INFORMATION AT ALL, ESPECIALLY INFORMATION THAT IS SO "CRITICAL" AND "IMPORTANT"?????

    WHO IS LEAKING THIS INFO TO AN ORDINARY CITIZEN?



    WHY ISN'T ANYONE ASKING THESE QUESTIONS BESIDES ME???????
     
  2. Loading...


  3. VespaElf

    VespaElf Little Miss Showcase(runner-up)

    Messages:
    2,380
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Two words............LOU SMIT.


    I find it very interesting that in the U.K the first article about the new "film" had a mention of Lou Smit as being involved(and I want to say a picture of him.......is that true Jayelles??) but then Tracey outright denies any involvement on Smit's part.


    Which leads me to ask............who gave the U.K media that info??????
    Why is Tracey so adamant???


    I think Lou has been mining his cache of stolen BPD files and feeding them to Tracey.

    The whole thing is filthy as is what happens when theres lies and money and everybody out for themselves and theyre using a dead little girl to do so (hey! sounds like John's political campaign!!!!!!).
     
  4. K777angel

    K777angel New Member

    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Bravo Barbara!! Important questions to be asking.

    We have to remember that there is NO real investigation going on in the DA's office in the JonBenet Ramsey case. The WHOLE POINT of Keenan telling the public that her office is taking a new look at the Ramsey case was to aid Lin Wood and his paid position by the Ramseys in manipulating public opinion!!
    This whole garbage of a 'documentary' is playing right into that and whatever JUNK "leads" the office could slip over to RST they did! This guy Tracey's crock is calling a suspect (who really isn't) is all part of the same on-going SCHEME. And they know it.
     
  5. Peki51

    Peki51 New Member

    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Barbara,

    Personally I think this whole "crock" is the ugly, disgusting side of this so called active murder investigation. That this information was obviously leaked to Tracey in the first place is wrong. He had enough insider information to create the documentary and someone backed him with enough money to get it produced and on the air. Follow the money and we may just get some other good clues as to what is really behind this cloak and dagger investigation.

    I don't think that this latest suspect is going to turn out to be viable, however, the name is out and wouldn't it be nice if he would come forward and settle the score one way or the other. For some reason, Tracey seems to think he was worth sleuthing out to make some money off of, so now lets see if he can put his money where his mouth is and produce something out of his latest suspect instead of spinning the wheel of fortune one more time.

    Thanks, Barbara, for your thought provoking post.

    Peki
     
  6. vicktor

    vicktor New Member

    Messages:
    797
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Keenan being the DA hired Tom Bennett, the veteran investigator at $25 hour according to The Denver Post. If she had told him during the employment interview that she wasn't really interested in an investigation, or that she implied it was just a formality, would he have taken the job? If he was told by his superior, Keenan, to go easy, or find any possible suspect, would he continue to do his job? If his work produced a good (or bad) suspect whose name was then leaked to someone in the media who publicized it making his job more difficult, would he continue to work on the case? The likely and obvious answers are no. In fact, if he did resign, he might make his lack of confidence a matter of public record.
     
  7. tezi

    tezi Member of Websleuths since 2000.

    Messages:
    5,364
    Likes Received:
    34
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Amen Messie! :clap:

    Barbara,

    You already know how I feel. Thank you for posting this here!

    Victor,

    I am sure Bennett is being told to look at other leads other than the Ramseys.
     
  8. BrotherMoon

    BrotherMoon Former Member

    Messages:
    753
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Barbara, this is what people do. We tell stories, we gossip, we start rumors, we pass rumors. It's all in good fun, ins't it? Look at the movies, t.v., novels, yellow journalism, the tabs, sometimes people prefer fantasy to fact, dream to consciousness. Listen to Coast to Coast a.m. There's no conspiracy here, it's just a good boogeyman story. Even if the truth came out about what Patsy did, yellow journalism would still run boogeyman stories about the intruder and people would still buy into it.
     
  9. Jayelles

    Jayelles New Member

    Messages:
    2,389
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes. The biggest article about the doc was in the TV Times which is the magazine for the TV channel which broadcast it. This article had a photo of Lou Smit and a caption which said "Lou Smit believes Michael Helgoth and an accomplice killed JonBenet". I reported that correctly at the time and another British poster, Enola, scanned the article and it was posted. I was in contact with three of the journalists who covered the documentary and the one who wrote this particular review had certainly done the most research (this was evident from the articles anyway).

    However, it is apparent that Lou Smit DIDN'T participate in this documentary and the footage of him was old. My guess is that there was an assumption made that he believed in the theory because his footage appeared to endorse what they proceeded to build upon. On closer inspection, there is a lot about the documentary which may not be what it appears to be.
     
  10. Barbara

    Barbara New Member

    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is Jameson's response to my thread.



    jameson
    Member since 5-8-02
    07-13-04, 11:14 AM (EST)

    19. "RE: Responding to BORG"
    In response to message #0

    on my knowing about Gigax before the documentary discussion online...

    Q: "AND FOR THOSE WHO HAVE CHOSEN TO BELIEVE JAMESON THAT SHE HAD ALL THIS INFORMATION, I WOULD ASK: WHY DOES AN ORDINARY CITIZEN HAVE ALL THIS INFORMATION???????????????

    SHE IS NOTHING BUT A CITIZEN. WHY WAS SHE GIVEN ANY INFORMATION AT ALL, ESPECIALLY INFORMATION THAT IS SO "CRITICAL" AND "IMPORTANT"?????"

    How so? And why? What makes you more than just an "ordinary citizen"? And by whose authority? Yours? The Ramseys? LE? Please explain

    I'll repeat: Why? What and WHO gave you case files, documents, tapes and letters????? By whose authority?

    By whose authority were persons on the "inside" having conversations with you that are not public and WHY? Again, by whose authority?

    If the investigators are coming to you NUMEROUS TIMES for information on this case, an ordinary citizen from Hickory, NC, then this case is scarier than I thought. If you have information that investigators don't have, it is at the very least inappropriate, and at the very most ILLEGAL

    I
    The fact that you are publicly admitting that you have your OWN files, not shared with LE is quite telling and disheartening if its true. Actually, the fact that you have files at all in this case is very disturbing, unless you can show that you are more than an "ordinary citizen" as you claim

    So you are saying that they share confidential information, just not HIGHLY confidential information. As far as breaking confidences---EVER, there are a few posters on the internet who would disagree. You know, those people who you posted personal information on and those persons whose jobs you called? Maybe it's just me, but that is not keeping a confidence.

    .

    Dear God, I hope you're making this up!

    *sigh* If only that were true

    Bottom line: What makes you more than an ordinary citizen?

    If you haven't been ordained as such by anyone other than yourself, then what you do and what you hear is ILLEGAL and obviously someone is LEAKING information; and if they are leaking information to YOU, then it must be someone who thinks the Ramseys innocent. Now who could that be hmmmm?
     
  11. Sprocket

    Sprocket Former Member

    Messages:
    3,955
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    She's a legend in her own mind. The legend, just keeps getting bigger and bigger. :D
     
  12. Tricia

    Tricia Owner Websleuths.com Staff Member Administrator

    Messages:
    23,683
    Likes Received:
    2,172
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Hey all. Her name is Susan Bennett. She feels comfortable hiding behind her hat. She doesn't feel comfortable when we use her real name.

    Someone who knows their stuff explained this to me in detail :)
     
  13. BrotherMoon

    BrotherMoon Former Member

    Messages:
    753
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Again, some people prefer fantasy to reality.

    That's why JonBenet is dead.
     
  14. TressaRing28

    TressaRing28 Former Member

    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0



    Hey Trica thanks--- Susan Bennett I enjoy writing that name since she hates it used ,I might have to use it alot . :D
     
  15. K777angel

    K777angel New Member

    Messages:
    515
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    LOL!!

    Like LE has respect for some obsessed nutcase from NC.
    More like suspicion isn't it?
     
  16. Jeana (DP)

    Jeana (DP) Former Member

    Messages:
    26,902
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My question is "Who is Gilgax"?
     
  17. TressaRing28

    TressaRing28 Former Member

    Messages:
    226
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Rainsong
    Member since 7-4-03
    07-13-04, 09:51 PM (EST)

    32. "RE: Another editorial"
    In response to message #31

    "Be damned if they are going to be proven wrong, no matter how blatant the evidence."
    Yep, that about sums it up.

    Rainsong




    Hello Barbara,

    This RAINSONG AT Susan Bennetts site makes me :furious: . It appears to me that Bennett and her posse is to be damned if they are to be proven wrong!!!!
     
  18. Barbara

    Barbara New Member

    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    No problem TressaRing28

    Don't upset yourself. After a while, we learn to expect nothing more from that ilk

    I work with the mentally challenged and if there is one thing to be learned, it is that one can only reach a POTENTIAL. They have all reached theirs. They will never be more than they are now. At times, even I, knowing better give it a shot and show them the FACTS, but it is usually futile.

    There are none so blind...............
     
  19. Arielle

    Arielle New Member

    Messages:
    886
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am not a Brit, have not seen the new Tracey doc, and have had no time to wade through the transcripts. I'm lazy I guess. Would someone please give me the Readers Digest version. Who is this guy and what does he have to do with anything?
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice