Why BOTH Garrote & Head Bash?

Discussion in 'JonBenet Ramsey' started by Rupert, Jan 29, 2006.

  1. Rupert

    Rupert Former Member

    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I would like to concentrate on why the perp both Garroted and Bashed JonBenet. There have been various reasons I know of suggested:

    1. perhaps the Head Bash occurred first by accident and the Garrote was a coverup (ST) - with an amazing lack of blood loss,
    2. the perp enjoyed the Garrote and then finished off with the Head Bash because 3of a struggle - again an amazing lack of blood loss
    4. the perp first did the Garrote and then the Head Bash for just sadistic pleasure,
    5. the perp first did the Garrote and then the Head Bash as a step by step ritual (eg Celtic midwinter garrote/bash sacrifice).

    I'm just a laymen here, but the low loss of blood to the Head Bash suggests to me that it was NOT done immediately after the Garrote and therefore suggests to me that it was planned that way.

    I think it is central to the motive and important to discuss in itself. Why do you think both the Garrote and Head Bash were done?
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Holdontoyourhat

    Holdontoyourhat Former Member

    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The headbash IMO followed the strangulation to assure JBR couldn't be revived. Strangulation alone doesn't guarantee for any perp that she couldn't be revived. Bobby Franks provides a good comparison. He was strangled, and hit over the head. So was Bob Crane. Its a MO.
     
  4. BlueCrab

    BlueCrab New Member

    Messages:
    3,053
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0

    I agree the strangulation, maybe by accident, likely killed JonBenet. The petechial hemorrhages on the top and bottom of the neck ligature and on the eyelids support this conclusion. Dead bodies don't pump blood and cause petechial hemorrhages.

    However, the extreme tightening of the ligature around the neck, sinking the cord grotesquely into JonBenet's skin, and the vicious hit on the head, splitting the skull in two were, IMO, to help make the murder look like the work of a foreign terrorist and thus divert suspicion away from the sexual aspects of the killing and hence divert suspicion away from a family member.

    BlueCrab
     
  5. Holdontoyourhat

    Holdontoyourhat Former Member

    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Accidental strangulation borders the very outer rims of reality to such an extent that it shouldn't even be mentioned. Clearly JBR was strangled deliberately, due to the established 'fact' her attacker was using deadly force. JBR was alive when the garrote was tightened enough to cause local hemmorhaging. Any suggestion otherwise 'doesn't further the investigation'.
     
  6. Holdontoyourhat

    Holdontoyourhat Former Member

    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sinking the cord, and splitting of the skull, as you say, were in fact a by-product of the deadly force that was used on JBR. This is because it is established that JBR was murdered by an attacker who was in fact using deadly force. The motive behind the deadly force isn't new: prevent JBR from becoming a witness.
     
  7. Rupert

    Rupert Former Member

    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I have the book: The Crime of the Century by Hal Higdon (The Leopold and Loeb Case).

    Leopold & Loeb picked out Bobby Franks as a target for a lark, something they could remember to bond each other with and prove their Nietzchian superiority. They had previously bought a rope with the intention to strangle and had also considered etherization. Bobby Franks was strangled first, struggled, then they stuck the gag down his throat. Then he was bashed. Both argued that the other did the head bashing with the wrapped chisel. They hid the body in a culvert on 118th Street in Chicago.

    Clarence Darrow defended them in The Crime of the Century. Darrow was a veteran of the CHAUTAUQUA circuit and very coincidently there was a CHAUTAUQUA Park righht behind the university in Boulder.

    They pleaded their defense claiming Nietzche was being permeated into every university in the civilized world. You then know what happened in Germany.

    The L&L ransom note reads like the JonBenet RN.

    No wonder many websleuthes have compared this crime to JonBenet.

    Did our perp intentionally throw in hints of the L&L crime? Was JonBenet to take over the Crime of the Century? Bobby Franks was strangled, suffocated and head bashed. Is that why JonBenet was garroted and headbashed?
     
  8. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,188
    Likes Received:
    146
    Trophy Points:
    63

    A 6th option to add to your list is that of Accidental Head Trauma.

    It is very common during homicides for perpetrators to lose control of the dead body, since it becomes an inert force, or/and whilst moving the body the head strikes the floor!

    JonBenet has many marks and abrasions on her body, a simple explanation may be after being garrotted with the cord alone, her killer dragged her body, possibly by the feet, she may have been wearing or wrapped in something that caused those stun-gun like impressions/abrasions on her skin, whilst being dragged her head, lets be tactful and say bounced off the floor, or down a stair or two, thus splitting it open. The killer need not be aware of this!

    Also its entirely possible that an intruder slipped into the house with the sole intention of killing JonBenet. He/she whacked JonBenet, whilst her back was turned, over the head rendering her unconscious, JonBenet falls to the ground, incurring abrasions, and her attacker loops the ligature cord around her neck, strangling her to make certain she is dead!


    .
     
  9. Rupert

    Rupert Former Member

    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    UKGuy,
    I think the abrasian (or stun gun mark) is on the right side of the face while the head bash traume is on the other. Correct me if I am wrong.

    Also, the head bash no doubt must have been from a tremendous force. If JonBenet was flung across the room at such force, then where are the other traumas on the same side of the body? And just what is it that Steve Thomas thinks forced that accidental injury? The taps on the bathtub? Why hasn't that been clarified if it is the BPD theory?

    Seriously, I just don't see such brutal head bash as accidental.

    Apparently a Denver doctor stated that there are cases where little blood loss has resulted in head trauma. But I would think that is rare and this would take the cake. I seriously doubt the garrote came after the head bash.

    Rupert
     
  10. Nehemiah

    Nehemiah Active Member

    Messages:
    1,622
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    36
    There are those who think that JB may have been strangled initially by a cord, such as Nintendo 64, and the garrotte was devised to hide the tell tale markings of the original cord. So, not necessarily classified as an accidental strangulation, but an accidental death.
     
  11. UKGuy

    UKGuy Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    9,188
    Likes Received:
    146
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Rupert,

    Yes the garrote after the head bash does seem out of sequence, but it may be what happened.

    I'm only citing the abrasions and marks, since its possible they could have resulted after her death whilst her body lay unattended or while she was being moved, I'm not committed on this.

    The head bash as the result of being dragged or her falling if she was garroted from behind, Luca Brsasi style, it is very very common in homicides, and is often used to distinguish between those experienced in the use of violence, or unplanned homicides.


    .
     
  12. Holdontoyourhat

    Holdontoyourhat Former Member

    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sometimes a banana is just a banana. JBR was murdered by strangulation and headbash. The killer used deadly force on JBR, a fact that is easily proven. There was no accidental strangulation. There was no accidental death either. It can be glossed over, sugar-coated, hyped, warped, and spun, but there's no getting around this fact.
     
  13. Holdontoyourhat

    Holdontoyourhat Former Member

    Messages:
    5,299
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    My guess is a homicide victim has about the same chance of having their skull 'accidentally fractured' as they have of being struck by lightning (lol).
     
  14. BlueCrab

    BlueCrab New Member

    Messages:
    3,053
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    0

    Rupert,

    That 118 is interesting. There never has been a convincing explanation why JonBenet's killer asked for a $118,000 ransom.
     
  15. Linda7NJ

    Linda7NJ Active Member

    Messages:
    30,907
    Likes Received:
    14
    Trophy Points:
    38
    I think the head bash came when the person strangling her realized it was a far longer and difficult task than he/she ever imagined. I believe her head was bashed when she began to convulse or it seemed to be taking forever to finish little Jon Benet off.
     
  16. sissi

    sissi Former Member

    Messages:
    1,832
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Rupert, BC, yep, yep, it sure would fit with the "rest" of the ransom note. Who would remember all of these bits and pieces , other than a "student" of serial killings and violent flicks? Does this ring of a "rainman" type? It's no wonder McElroy was on a suspect list, given his obsession with the serial killer reading room, his mention of films, his writings about "offing a barbie", yet, he isn't the ONE! Scary to think there was another like him, but given Boulder's "charm" and seemingly a wonderful place for the mentally ill to hang their hats, there may be hundreds like him. The BPD should have sought out and interviewed each and every one.
    Is it impossible to think that someone very close to the Ramseys chose one of this kind as a boyfriend, allowing him time in the house while on "duty" babysitting or cleaning?
     
  17. Rupert

    Rupert Former Member

    Messages:
    342
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Sissi,
    Yep, lately this guy got me interested too. I didn't know he was obsessed with the serial killer reading room and mentioned films!

    Also, Irish name, works on websites (who knows maybe APAC's). (See where I'm going BlueCrab? Maybe he got to know JBR through NI.) I could not figure what the K.J.L.N Group was that last updated APAC. It should be some type of CU "student group".

    The Prophet was the only guy with the barbie doll connection. At that time there was activist commotion on the Sweatshop Barbie thing. Some well known activist had visited Boulder about that time or earlier. All this could have added inspiration to a nutcase (not necessarily The Prophet) who was just aching to do a little Barbie anyway. Motive might have been the thrill kill, but the politics was used as a ruse and inspiration.

    Why did The Prophet post what he did anyway? Did he do it as a political statement? Or just a vent for anger relating to Barbie? The Barbie made in sweatshops was a Christmas present to little American girls. Some time ago I even thought of "Sweatshop Barbie Takes Christmas".

    No doubt, the Barbie thing is a significant part of the puzzle.
     
  18. sissi

    sissi Former Member

    Messages:
    1,832
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    When I go "back" to '97 or '98, and type in prophet at bigfoot, why do the key words include Jonbenet?

    Here is a pic of something I just got..

    From: prop...@bigfoot.com (Prophet)
    Subject: Serial Killer Web Library
    Date: 1997/03/03
    Message-ID: <prophet-ya023580000303970813590001@news.earthlink.net>#1/1
    X-Deja-AN: 222769310
    Organization: Earthlink Network, Inc.
    Keywords: serial kill mass murder death torture jonbenet ramsey
    Newsgroups: alt.true-crime


    Please take advantage of the Serial Killer Reading Room online. And do not
    hesitate to explore all of the controversial Web site, Wide Awake!
     
  19. Becba

    Becba Former Member

    Messages:
    1,384
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Dr. Cyril Wecht has maintaned that he believes the garrote pinched a main nerve causing Jon Benet to stop breathing and seem for all appearances dead. He believes the blow was delivered when the murderer thought she had died and wanted to hide what she died of. Or became angry angry did it.
     
  20. ellen13

    ellen13 New Member

    Messages:
    749
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I guess I have always thought that she was hit on the head first. To me, if she was strangled right after getting hit in the head, then she wouldn't have much blood in the brain because the strangulation would have cut off the blood supply to the brain. In my mind, this explains why there wasn't bleeding in the brain.
     
  21. txsvicki

    txsvicki Active Member

    Messages:
    14,189
    Likes Received:
    4
    Trophy Points:
    36
    I believe that it was all premeditated and that the strangulation was not accidental and that the head injury must have came just as JonBenet was deceased from the strangling with the cord. One thing has bothered me though. Why wasn't the face red or discolored from trapped blood like some victims of strangling? I haven't read anything about that happening or why not.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice