When it comes to the Ramsey case obviously the public is divided into different camps and factions as it relates to guilt over the murder but have you ever asked yourself why the actual investigators on the case came to radically different conclusions about what happened the night JonBenet died? Steve Thomas- Believed Patsy Ramsey did it over bed wetting. Linda Arndt- Believed John Ramsey did it. Lou Smit- Believed an intruder did it. James Kolar- Believed Burke Ramsey did it over stolen pineapple. Why are the official law enforcement personnel assigned to the case, who have access to all of the evidence, continuously coming to different conclusions?