Why take "rocks" into evidence??

Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by Blue_Dolphin308, Nov 13, 2008.

  1. Blue_Dolphin308

    Blue_Dolphin308 We can't help everyone, But everyone can help some

    Messages:
    3,397
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Why take anything at all into evidence??If there was NO EVIDENTUARY value in what they found, then why take the supposed "rocks"??? Something is ROTTEN in what just happened!!!
     
  2. Loading...


  3. MaryAnn

    MaryAnn New Member

    Messages:
    1,754
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I agree. I think there is more to this than meets the eye. How did it go from toes and fingers to nothing?
     
  4. MOMto5

    MOMto5 "Nana" to one

    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I posted this on the NG thread but am moving here:
    Didn't the red-headed reporter at the scene say earlier that she saw the bones and they sure looked like bones to her?? Then the diver says they looked like bones, right? Then LE says they were rocks?? What kind of rocks are shaped like fingers and toes? Something is not right.
     
  5. Charge Them All

    Charge Them All New Member

    Messages:
    296
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0

    She did say that, and I thought the same thing.
     
  6. ArkansasMom

    ArkansasMom New Member

    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Maybe it's all in reading in between the lines. If they said there were no "bones" found, that wouldn't mean there were no bone "fragments" found would it?
     
  7. dancingdaisy

    dancingdaisy ^j^

    Messages:
    839
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Casey is/was just too close with too many LE and George being an ex cop....it's like a brotherhood of sorts. How do you know who you can trust in LE at this point?

    Just a random thought I had.
     
  8. Hailiejade77

    Hailiejade77 ~TEAM CAYLEE~

    Messages:
    1,910
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I believe bones were found. I also believe that LE is saying that its not bones because until they can CONFIRM that it is actually Caylee they are going to keep it underwraps. Just think about how the Anthony's neighborhood will be when Caylee is found?! I am sure there is going to be protesters and riots due to the Anthony's adamantly denying that Caylee is dead. There is alot of emotion in the whole world for Caylee and there are people that will have mob mentality when Caylee is found. JMO
     
  9. MommaShark

    MommaShark New Member

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I am confused did they take anything into evidence. I thought LE said no.
     
  10. Blue_Dolphin308

    Blue_Dolphin308 We can't help everyone, But everyone can help some

    Messages:
    3,397
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Originally Posted by LI_Mom [​IMG]
    Oh, puh-lease!!!

    To think that ANYTHING Cindy says is reliable info for this investigation is laughable, isn't it?

    Of course, she'll always deny ANY evidence that is found as ever belonging to Caylee or if it's known to be something Caylee once had, she'll magically produce the article & say it was at her house all the time.

    ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

    Ok not saying that she will tell the truth, but they still should have taken the toys into evidence, because now the chain of evidence is no longer viable! They coould have gotten evidence, from the toys for either this case or another case, but how many people ahve now touched these toys? Where are the toys going? It wouldn't have taken much to just take them into evidence, Just in case. But now the oppurtunity no longer exists because it is now considered tampered evidence.
    __________________
     
  11. Blue_Dolphin308

    Blue_Dolphin308 We can't help everyone, But everyone can help some

    Messages:
    3,397
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    Yes they took "rocks" into found evidence!
     
  12. MommaShark

    MommaShark New Member

    Messages:
    205
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    ROCKS!!! Oh come on. We all know they would not take rocks. So it must have been plastic or I don't know... Bone maybe. I tend to believe the last. Rocks... huh. Where and when was this said.
     
  13. Voice4theSilent

    Voice4theSilent Active Member

    Messages:
    2,022
    Likes Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    38
    1. Can someone please post a link to something stating they took rocks into evidence? (Everything I read says they took nothing.) Thanks in advance!

    2. How can something look like bones to the divers and LP turn out to be twigs?

    3. This whole case has turned into a dog and pony show! :crazy::bang:
     
  14. ArkansasMom

    ArkansasMom New Member

    Messages:
    27
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They would not take little rocks into evidence... what is it evidence of? Um, let's see... nope, drawing a blank. And for the toys - who would weight down kid toys with bricks and why? Or were those not weighted down...?
     
  15. insatiable

    insatiable New Member

    Messages:
    623
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I can see finding a rock that might of looked like a bone, but wasn't it a few that were found? And I'm assuming they were found grouped together. A group of rocks that looks like fingers and toes...and this is the only group of these that were found in that water? Were the toys and garbage bag with rocks or bones in it found near each other?
     
  16. Blue_Dolphin308

    Blue_Dolphin308 We can't help everyone, But everyone can help some

    Messages:
    3,397
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    36
    It was said on Nancy Grace tonite that the "rocks" were taken into found evidence. Not able to locate a link yet.
     
  17. hmlykins

    hmlykins New Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ok, correct me if I am wrong..and I certainly could be since I wasn't paying to much attention at the time but didn't someone say on NG the what LE took was actually something someone lost and they was returning to that person?
     
  18. Pattymarie

    Pattymarie New Member

    Messages:
    2,102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    so you think this is what LE is doing for damage control until the results are in?
     
  19. jbar

    jbar Just My Opinion

    Messages:
    422
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    They called it "Found Property".
     
  20. MOMto5

    MOMto5 "Nana" to one

    Messages:
    1,372
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IIRC Several people that were either watching live on Murt's today or were at the dive site say LE took somethings away on a white stretcher.
     
  21. hmlykins

    hmlykins New Member

    Messages:
    26
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Yes, that is it. Thank you.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice