Wow if we used the same theory that the Boulder DAs office is using in the Ramsey case with Chandra Levys case, Chandras killer would still be free and Washington DC would be waiting on CODIS to match the contaminated blood found on Chandras body. Just think the only reason her killer was convicted was from the testimony of another convict. In the Ramsey case there are 5 pieces of evidence that cannot be ignored.
1.) The Ransom note that matches Patsys writing
2.) The pineapple found in victims stomach matching that found in the bowl with Patsys prints
3.) The skull fracture consistent with blunt force trauma (detective Smit himself said it matched that of the flash light found at the scene), which oddly enough matched the Ramseys which they could not find
4.) Patsys Ramseys sweater fibers tangled in the knot of the garrote.
5.) Lack of ANY fingerprints on the ransom note yet the Ramseys admitted handling the note several times
Here is the simple plain facts in this case. The Ramseys wealth, along with the Boulder Police Departments lack of experience combined with the DAs office headed by pompous Alex Hunter who pampered and protected the Ramseys helped the Ramseys steer clear of any charges. This case will NEVER go to trial now because the killer is already dead. This case would drain Boulder financially and frankly the IQ in that town still hovers around that of the Hare Krishnas, hippies, and college binge drinkers who reside there (those from Colorado will get what I mean).
Perhaps it was with some hope that re-interviewing Burke Ramsey would spark some guilt in the boy for what he knows. Nine years old at the time of the crime, the kid certainly would have remembered if his sister was awake or not when they arrived home. In his original interview he stated she was. Later the story changed. He would also know about the pineapple and if that was his voice on the 911 call. I heard the original call, and I heard a boys voice. He asked, What did you find. Again, Boulder is too polite with this family. They should have drug this kid in who is now what 22? Since this is still an active and open case and given him a lie detector test. Refusal once again, would at least put pressure back on the only 2 people left in this world that know what happened to JonBenet Ramsey.
They will have to live with that for the rest of their lives. I cant imagine they live peacefully with this knowledge. They will continue to protect Patsy Ramsey who I believe suffered from a mental illness and killed her child in a fit of rage. I cant imagine that John or Burke Ramsey garners any amount of real respect in this world, and the disdain for their kind is not forgotten in the people who have shown remorse and love for JonBenet Ramsey, the public.
1.The writing in the note is not a match to Patsy or the State DA would have taken over already. Her matches were minimal, not enough for
any expert to testify,then be crossed examined and refuting experts to testify more was different than alike. Foster isn't considered valid 'cause he wrote that note to Patsy and shot himself in the foot when he did it. The State did examine the case and refuse because there was not enough to prosecute.
2. The pineapple is unimportant only in the fact that it helps to establish time of death. Kids do get up and eat in the middle of the night, that may be the real lie here, the only thing being covered up. Your statement gave me an idea as to why Burke was so protected, besides the fact that he had his sisters murder to deal with. Maybe they were up (the kids snuck out of bed). They heard something. Burke high tails it for his bedroom thinking it is his parents and he doesn't want to get caught. JB being bolder looks around and surprises someone in the house or even LETS THEM IN. She reported to an adult that she was EXPECTING a visit from a "secret Santa" after Christmas. Burke doesn't know who the killer is he went to his bedroom then fell asleep while listening and pretending to be asleep. If JB surprised someone that could explain why she sustained such a severe blow to the head, the reaction of the perp to being surprised. They have a flashlight in hand the supposed murder weapon.
3. The Flashlight-no
forensic expert will make a statement that for a fact they know the flashlight was the weapon used. The Flashlight found at crime scene was assumed to be the R's. It was on counter but French cannot state he saw it there upon first arriving. It could belong to people entering home, friends and police alike, the R's say they have one, it was a gift from Burke to John and
Patsy couldn't identify it. I haven't read any testimony from John or Burke on it and can easily understand why Patsy doesn't know- it wasn't her gift, she knew of it's existence but felt no need to ever use it as she would turn over any task requiring its use to John or Burke or any other male.
She had no interest in it therefore it's exact appearance does not register with her. We should look to what John or Burke have to say about it and its identity. Any Links to further info from them about would it be appreciated.
4. I have asked about the source for the fiber evidence in the garrote and THE ONLY SOURCE ever given is an internet site. I have already been told this particular site is not correct in all it's evidence. Thomas doesn't write of it, Schiller doesn't write of it, Douglas makes no comment on it. The autopsy(on-line) only lists hair. I have looked for any corroborating source, if you have one please post links and I don't mean National Enquirer or any other tabloid, as they made up or "leaked" false stuff throughout this case.Until then I count this evidence as invalid as I can not corroborate it.
5. There are finger print smudges that are not identifiable, Patsy's identifiable fingerprints are found, Thomas states it as well as Schiller. The quality of the prints is very important. Since most people hold a note close by its edges prints are not abundant on most notes. Patsy also states to John not to touch the note so at some point she becomes aware that a crime has been committed and that the note is evidence. Even in an RDI theory she would be acting this out. Her prints were found just very limited amounts of them.
You also state you heard the ORIGINAL 911 tape and heard a young boys voice on it. You just shot yourself in the foot dude.
No one could hear it on the original and it was
enhanced as it was too garbled to make out. You had to have heard an enhanced version to even know it was a young male person's voice. He later admitted he was only pretending to be asleep, something that further gave me that twist on the pineapple theory I posted above and something John Douglas said about people staying true to their character. If Burke pretended to be asleep that morning he most likely had done it before. Like a few hours earlier when he left JB downstairs with the pineapple.
It would fit an RDI or an IDI as Burke never knows if the person who killed his sister was his parents going downstairs to catch them or an IDI that JB surprises or lets in herself.
Being that he was 9 years old and the
certainly that any 9 year old is observant enough to remember details that you believe he should is where you are totally off base. I have raised 3 kids and if they could tell you what their siblings were doing the night before and be accurate is a wrong assumption. The fact that his sister was murdered would disrupt any memories the more time elapsed.
If my pineapple theory is correct it would allow for the R's to still engage in criminal activity. The crime staging or lying about the pineapple. If they wake Burke after finding the RN they are afraid he will be traumatized by thinking he abandoned JB. They tell him she has been kidnapped and he is not responsible in any way in fact they don't want him to do anything except what he did already pretend to be asleep until we come get you. We are calling police and they will handle it. You know nothing about this and are to forget it. You are lucky you ran upstairs it could have been you they kidnapped instead.
This theory could work well for an RDI as the need for a RN is not to convince police but Burke it wasn't them up in the house he heard but an intruder. Works with the accidental theory as well as JB surprised JR or PR who struck her in the head as they didn't know and didn't expect the kids to be up. They did hear them downstairs and suspected to find a burglar not the kids.
You have a false sense of a person's rights when being questioned by police.
Miranda think Miranda.
You have the Right to remain silent. No one can make someone take a lie detector test, even when they were admissible in court they had to be consented to.
