This case just makes me so sad
It is sad - on many levels.
MG is the central figure in this story due to her diagnosis of schizophrenia, an illness from which her father suffered from his mid-teens. MG's
schizophrenia is unusual because of its early onset. There is no question that MG's diagnosis is real, not an attempt to avoid prosecution.
MG had been considered "weird" by classmates for some years. So why wasn't this noticed? Most weird kids will be teased and bullied, but this did not
appear to be the case for MG. In fact, her classmates found her behavior scary and left her alone. By MG's admission, her only friend for years had been
the victim... until AW arrived.
AW started attending the same middle school as MG and the victim. AW lived only a few dozen yards from MG. They shared the school bus. AW's parents had
divorced two years previously - she was living with her father and younger brother. AW's mother did not live in the same city. Her older step-siblings -
whom she appeared to get on with well - lived with their mother who tragically passed away from cancer earlier in 2014, after a long battle. As a result,
It's possible that AW, intelligent and well behaved, faded into the background amidst other family issues. She was a fan of fantasy of all kinds. If
anything, the horror genre was not a prominent one according to her online activity. Allegedly, she was having a hard time fitting in at middle school -
its not clear that she particular friends other than MG, and the victim whom she came to know as a result. According to classmates, the victim was still
MG's preferred friend, the one she ate lunch with.
The vitim is unusual because even in the face of MG's behavior and the fact that the girl had no other friends, she stuck with her. This loyalty
continued even after MG's behavior became controlling, and MG and AW were becoming agressive. The victim retained a naive belief that she would be able
to fix things, and was evidently delighted to be attending the sleepover. It's clear that MG recognized this naivete or gullibility and made use of it.
Supposedly, AW introduced MG to the Creepy Pasta stories on the Internet, where she came across Slender Man. MG was obviously interested in these stories
, which formed the basis of their bond. The friendship between MG and the victim on the other hand was more in keeping with their age including American
Girl dolls. The victim had no interest in Creepy Pasta - the stories terrified her. She asked MG to stop sharing them with her. Their relationship was
severely eroded as a result, and MG apparently began to treat her with some contempt. It may well be that the rejection of MG's primary interest by the
victim was how she became the victim.
AW must have been desperate to have and retain a friend. Her desperation was so great that rather than risking its loss by rejecting MG's suggestion, she
went along with it. This was January 2014. AW's online postings didn't seem to change - right up until the attack - suggesting that she was not really
thinking about it. She didn't really think (or was at least hoping) that it would all blow over. Meanwhile, it was an addictive game in which she played
her part in the planning and research. There is also some evidence to suggest that AW may have been frightened of MG. She may have wondered whether she
herself might become the victim... and MG only lived a couple of streets away. And all this time, noone, not parents, not the school, nor friends noticed
anything sufficiently amiss to raise alarms.
From the evidence found in her bedroom and school locker, MG's illness must have become significantly worse in the time since she learne dof Slender Man.
MG is not likely to have realized MG was very sick, attributing her descriptive and convincing delusions to macabre imagination, something she herself
shared. The difference was that for MG, this was reality, not a game that was going to stop short of actually causing harm.
I think that for AW, there should be considerable focus on the effect that MG's illness had on her own psyche from the time the plan was suggested and the
attack. AW, after all, does not have a diagnosis of mental illness, and there is no history whatsoever of her being violent. But in the thrall of MG and
the gruesome "game", she did not take advantage of the numerous occasions when she could have stopped the attack, right up until the final moments.
I don't really think AW believed the Slender Man myth. Her stated goal, after all, was to see him so she would know he was real. MG, on the other hand,
saw him all the time so needed no such "proof". But to justify her actions in her mind, there would have to be an exceptional situation, one which she
thought might transcend conventional morality. If Slender Man did exist, what then? Could anyone be blamed for doing what she did? In her police
interview, AW did claim to have briefly seen Slender Man after the stabbing.
There are two tragedies. The first is that of the victim. She survived, but the mental scars will be with her forever. As well as reliving the horror
that happened in the woods... does she learn to trust again? The second tragedy is that none of this need have happened if MG's condition been recognized
from the symptoms that she had been exhibiting for some years prior to the accident. Taking a mallet to school and claiming she could do whatever she
wanted with it - at age 9 - should have been a red flag that would have at least resulted in counseling. Her strange, aloof behavior in middle school
including delusional assertions should have been another flag. Instead, she was just seen as "weird" and ignored.
In what way MG could be considered fit to stand trial beats me. In many states, we've made the decision that its easier to call children adults than
tackle the root cause of the reason they became involved in crime in the first place. This is seen as being "tough on crime", something that Judge Bohren
may believe will be his legacy. It will be.