I feel like I am watching a different trial than the guys on Channel 5
I'm not listening to them so I can't weigh in right now on Channel 5 at all.
But this week, in the reporters summaries of testimony this week, I feel like the media overall has been very "hype-y" about the defense and personally saying in videos that even they, the reporters now have doubts etc....
I feel like some of this is done as publicity/media stunt to "get people to tune in" and make more of the defense than it really is.
And namely, pump up every minute until that jury finally decides.
Because how compelling is it to say "there is no doubt due to Autry's testimony. Defense has got nothing so far."? Not very compelling at all for a stations' bottom line of viewers.
Even if it's what they think -----If that is what they, the media says, people aren't tuning in for "the juice".
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk