Discussion in 'Holly Bobo' started by Harmony 2, Sep 9, 2017.
i am concerned that so much talk about Britt is going to catch on with at least one juror.
This does seem to be the type of circumstance that leads to defendants getting a new trial.
As it should. I just can't understand why the defense wouldn't get a cell phone expert.
I don't know how relevant the info is anyway.
Ouch, that hurts. TBI admitted they dropped the ball but it still really stings and is unfortunate for the family and friends of Holly. -IMO
Thanks for the information. I probably read it previously and forgot.
A good rule of thumb in general, if you are attempting to have a witness designated as an expert, you should make sure that the witness would consider himself to be an expert qualified to testify. If the witness says no during trial prep, ask the witness who HE would consider to be an expert, and call THAT person to testify. Get a copy of their CV. Ask other attorneys in your area who they would call as an expert.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
i can't believe the story this guy just told...Britt confessed but no one followed up?
He said!?! Isn't all this hearsay from Britt?? :dunno: I don't understand?
can't believe judge tells her "not in front of jury"....she is made to look even worse than she is.
That's why I posted my previous comment. WTH? This is just not believable.
I have a question and would appreciate your opinion. Is it possible that she could not find an expert that disagreed with the state's expert? Because, assuming there is only one truth about the call phones, if she is obligated to find an expert with a differing opinion, I have often wondered what that says about the reliability of "experts". Would you mind elaborating on that a little? Thanks!
My mother and I often laugh at all the "experts" on television news. I swear, a story could come up about underwater basket weaving during lunar eclipses and every station would have an expert.
well cross should be good...this guy seems to be disgusted at the investigation and trying to set his record straight.
I don't know what to think of this "experts" testimony, but I think it may have been enough for reasonable doubt...
Didn't Britt testify for the state in this case, or am I confused?
unless she has one coming up that is no doubt exactly what happened...but this story about Britt is strange.
i have to wonder if there are a bunch of people on the 'take" here.