Awful to imagine Baby Es mother sat opposite LL in that court room knowing LLs version of events doesn't match hers at all. It really must be a very difficult thing for the parents, particularly when they must be sure she is lying (imo).
Why has she brought up 'raw sewerage' today? Is she claiming it caused the death of this particular baby or some of the other babies? Did BM ask any of the experts whether raw sewerage could have caused the deaths (I assume not)? Just seems like another desperate, haphazard move from her.
It makes no sense, why would a nurse come an hour later. Ll said it was a quiet night, so they weren’t exceptionally busy, why would that nurse wait an hour to assist.This just sounds desperate now, to me.
I think Baby E's mum showing up a little early for the feeding really caught LL off guard that night. It caused her to make some quick decisions about her notes and she made some sloppy, risky choices. Thank Goodness this KC is picking up on all of it and putting it to her.Seems as though she can’t make up her mind on this one. First the mothers timing, the bile, the nappy and now the colour on the abdomen; quite in contrast with what she’s said previously.
All my own thoughts JMO etc
It makes no sense, why would a nurse come an hour later. Ll said it was a quiet night, so they weren’t exceptionally busy, why would that nurse wait an hour to assist.
Moo
Interesting because that’s just what I was thinking; is this yet another colleague we’re hearing of taking blame.I think the assumption we can make is that LL is gently suggesting that this nurse is the one who caused the bleeding, hence why she’s shifted the narrative to state that there was no blood until 10pm.
I really feel for them. It would take a hell of a lot of restraint to sit there calmly and listen to herAwful to imagine Baby Es mother sat opposite LL in that court room knowing LLs version of events doesn't match hers at all. It really must be a very difficult thing for the parents, particularly when they must be sure she is lying (imo).
“Sometimes we don’t document everything” can now be interpreted in a whole different way; eg, bleeding at 9 as claimed by the prosecution and baby Es mother.2m ago12:32
Letby accused of using colleagues to cover up 'sabotage'
Lucy Letby is now being asked about further omissions to her nursing notes on the night Child E died.
"Sometimes we don't document everything," she tells the court.
She is then asked if, in the "excitement of sabotaging" Child E, she overlooked certain details.
"No," she replies.
Letby's colleague was feeding a child at 10pm in another room at the time Letby claims Child E began bleeding. (This is a source of disagreement - the prosecution has previously claimed he began bleeding an hour earlier).
"Why were you asking her to do observations on Child E?" Nick Johnson asks.
Letby says she does not recall.
"Is it so at the time of his collapse you had someone else's writing and signature on the paperwork?" Mr Johnson asks.
"No."
Then Mr Johnson says: "You got other people to write things on charts to cover up what you were doing."
"No, that is not correct," Letby replies.
Lucy Letby trial latest: Ex-nurse says 'raw sewage' and 'plumbing issues' in hospital could have contributed to baby deaths
![]()
Lucy Letby trial: Facebook searches of nurse accused of murdering babies read out in court
Lucy Letby, a former neonatal nurse, has been back in court for another day of cross-examination by the prosecution on Friday. She is accused of the murder of seven babies and the attempted murder of 10 others, and denies all the charges.news.sky.com
how can she say it “collectively” explains the searches. If she was searching the family while baby f was on the unit, she could ONLY be looking for reactions to the death of baby E, or photos or the like.12:37pm
NJ: "You killed [Child E], didn't you?"
LL: "No."
NJ: "Why in the aftermath were you so obsessed with [Child E and F's mother]?"
LL: "I don't think I was obsessed."
Letby says she "often" thought of Child E and Child F.
Mr Johnson says the name of Child E and F's mother was searched for nine times, and the name of the father once.
Letby said she searched "to see how [Child F] was doing."
One of the searches was when Child F was on the neonatal unit.
Letby said the other searches were made after Child F had left the unit, so "collectively" what she had said was correct.
Mr Johnson says Letby was looking for the family's reaction. Letby disagrees.
One of the searches is on Christmas Day. "Didn't you have better things to do?"
Letby said the family were on her mind.
![]()
Recap: Lucy Letby trial, May 24 - cross-examination continues
The trial of Lucy Letby, who denies murdering seven babies at the Countess of Chester Hospital neonatal unit and attempting to murder 10 more,…www.chesterstandard.co.uk
AbsolutelyI’m baffled to be honest. She accepts the 9.11pm phone call happened but not that the mother was there at 9pm. She accepts the mothers drawings of the blood on the baby was accurate (therefore the mother has absolutely seen this) but not that it happened at 9pm. She says drs don’t always record notes about omitting feeds? Where the dr/sho says he always records. But there is no recording and there is no recollection of omitting the feed.
Was the feed supposedly omitted because of the 16ml mucky aspirate? If there was no blood why would it be omitted at 9pm at all?
I genuinely think she’s made herself look quite silly today.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.