I disagree. Please explain further.BDI is appealing as it does line up well with available evidence and timeline.
He said he thought it looked like fruit. He paused and leaned in to get a better look at the pic and kind of fidgeted. The footage was made available to the public by CBS and is played with creepy background noises in an attempt to make Burke's responses seem sinister. There's another portion of interview where he calmly and in a straightforward manner answers a series of detailed questions about whether or not he and JBR liked and were ever fed pineapple. He readlily responds in the affirmative.Although, his refusal to identify the pineapple in the photo for the psychologist is curious. No doubt, the parents and their lawyers coached him, as they did for his GJ appearance.
How do you know he was coached for either the interview with Schuller or the GJ appearance? I'm not saying he definitely wasn't but what source or evidence is there for that there was "no doubt"? Is this just an assumption?
The Bernhard interview had been recommended by the Child Fatality Review Team. Kolar speculated the R's allowed it for fear of Burke being removed from them were they to refuse. Steve Thomas believed Patsy went along with it to allow herself and her lawyer to be alone in the waiting room with Linda Arndt, who was very sympathetic to Patsy.BR's interview with Dr. Bernhard was mandated by the state. He told Dr. B that he knew what happened, i.e. someone had a knife and led his sister downstairs and whacked her over the head. The Swiss Army knife was found in the basement. Kolar's speculation about the train track pokes is clever, but dubious. Would BR have known of the size 12s? He could have made the mistake of using the wrong size but the right weekday. So could John.
According to the maid, only Patsy knew the location of the Swiss army knife. The maid had hidden it from Burke because she couldn't take him whittling in the house.
Are you suggesting it was Burke who redressed JBR and replaced her underpants? Why would Burke have done that?
I'm not necessarily sold on Steve Thomas' theory but the idea that Patsy inflicted the head-blow in a moment of rage does fit a fair amount of the evidence. JBR had a history of toileting and in particular, specifically soiling accidents, that no family member seems to want to talk about. Her toilet contained unflushed waste, a pair of her soiled pants were found inside-out on her bathroom floor and a diaper package was pulled partway off of a shelf too high up for JBR to be able to reach. JBR's room is otherwise neat but a trophy has been knocked off of a high shelf. First responders claim her bedroom stank of urine.Thomas's PDI concerning bed wetting also does not explain the sustained savagery, and the layers of (re)staging. Patsy's illness provided the context for the events. In a way, it was the catalyst. Christmas was the grotesque climax.
So if in a moment of rage, one adult had inflicted the blow to the head, another adult, not wanting to go down for a separate and equally serious type of abuse could conceivably have had a motive for participating in a complex coverup.
Why would JR/PR want to involve Burke in any way shape or form in this? Whether or not he did it (the evidence suggests he didn't), they're going to want to keep him out of it. And of course they're not going to want their surviving child to be in the house when the body is recovered. They're not going to want him to view his sister's corpse.Why did the parents & BR lie about his AM whereabouts? They did not ask him if he knew anything because he was sleeping?!! The Rs did not want BR in the house when the body was discovered. "What did you find?"
Last edited: