- Joined
- Feb 25, 2017
- Messages
- 7,073
- Reaction score
- 33,747
Elkhart, IN
Appeals court says sentence too harsh for armed home invasion
The headline in the above article is misleading but it's a good read otherwise. This appeal is about the judge's failure to abide by the terms of the plea deal, along with a couple of other issues. IMO cases like this and headlines like this are what causes people to lose trust in MSM and the justice system.
Michael Middaugh Sr., 51, was sentenced in September 2020 after pleading guilty to burglary and criminal confinement while armed with a deadly weapon, Level 2 and Level 3 felonies, as well as sexual battery under threat of deadly force, a Level 4 felony. He also admitted to a habitual offender enhancement. Middaugh’s plea agreement provided for a thirty-year cap on any originally-imposed executed sentence.
He ended up with a 78 year sentence. He also got a life term of probation on one of the charges.
Indiana Supreme Court public access case search - MyCase
Original case # 20D03-2003-F2-000005
Appeal # 20A-CR-01777
Some notes on the sentences from the appeal decision:
Once a trial court accepts a plea agreement, it is “precluded from imposing any sentence other than [that] required by the plea agreement.”
The trial court imposed a thirty-year sentence for Middaugh’s Level 2 felony burglary conviction and enhanced that sentence by twenty years for being an habitual offender. This fifty-year sentence was in contradiction to the express terms of Middaugh’s plea agreement. The fact that the trial court stated at Middaugh’s sentencing hearing that it was suspending the habitual offender enhancement did not alleviate the error because an habitual offender enhancement cannot be suspended.
Upon remanding, we note the following sentencing principles. “Habitual offender is a status that results in an enhanced sentence. It is not a separate crime and does not result in a consecutive sentence.”
Lastly, we are aware of no authority permitting a trial court to place a defendant on probation for a lifetime as part of a sentence for a Level 3 felony criminal confinement.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the foregoing, we hold that the trial court erred when it sentenced Middaugh outside of the express terms of his plea agreement. [16] Reversed and remanded for resentencing consistent with this opinion.
Appeals court says sentence too harsh for armed home invasion
The headline in the above article is misleading but it's a good read otherwise. This appeal is about the judge's failure to abide by the terms of the plea deal, along with a couple of other issues. IMO cases like this and headlines like this are what causes people to lose trust in MSM and the justice system.
Michael Middaugh Sr., 51, was sentenced in September 2020 after pleading guilty to burglary and criminal confinement while armed with a deadly weapon, Level 2 and Level 3 felonies, as well as sexual battery under threat of deadly force, a Level 4 felony. He also admitted to a habitual offender enhancement. Middaugh’s plea agreement provided for a thirty-year cap on any originally-imposed executed sentence.
He ended up with a 78 year sentence. He also got a life term of probation on one of the charges.
Indiana Supreme Court public access case search - MyCase
Original case # 20D03-2003-F2-000005
Appeal # 20A-CR-01777
Some notes on the sentences from the appeal decision:
Once a trial court accepts a plea agreement, it is “precluded from imposing any sentence other than [that] required by the plea agreement.”
The trial court imposed a thirty-year sentence for Middaugh’s Level 2 felony burglary conviction and enhanced that sentence by twenty years for being an habitual offender. This fifty-year sentence was in contradiction to the express terms of Middaugh’s plea agreement. The fact that the trial court stated at Middaugh’s sentencing hearing that it was suspending the habitual offender enhancement did not alleviate the error because an habitual offender enhancement cannot be suspended.
Upon remanding, we note the following sentencing principles. “Habitual offender is a status that results in an enhanced sentence. It is not a separate crime and does not result in a consecutive sentence.”
Lastly, we are aware of no authority permitting a trial court to place a defendant on probation for a lifetime as part of a sentence for a Level 3 felony criminal confinement.
CONCLUSION:
Based on the foregoing, we hold that the trial court erred when it sentenced Middaugh outside of the express terms of his plea agreement. [16] Reversed and remanded for resentencing consistent with this opinion.
Last edited: