Good Morning Folks:daisy:
Here's hoping for a good day, although I was am not too optimistic about the appellate court reversing JSS. I was reading 17A A.R.S. Sup.Ct.Rules, Rule 122 Use of Recording Devices in a Courtroom,
http://www.sc.pima.gov/Portals/0/Library/Comm/Rule 122 effective 1-1-14.pdf
Excerpt:
(2) Limitation of coverage: Upon his or her own motion or upon the request of a party, victim, or witness, a judge may allow coverage as requested or may, after making specific, on-the-record findings based on the factors in paragraph (d)(1), impose limitations as follows:
(A) order that no one may photograph, record, or broadcast a criminal defendant, a law enforcement officer, or a victim in the courtroom;
(B) order that video coverage must effectively obscure the face and identity of that party, victim, or witness, or that there be only audio coverage of the testimony of a party, victim, or witness;
(C) prohibit coverage of the testimony of that witness upon a determination that coverage would have a substantial adverse impact upon that witness or his or her testimony.