The cameras were motion sensitive. Shouldn't there have been a security company monitoring those screens? What if terrorists were planting bombs all over to go off at a future date? (Unlikely I know).
Guest safety is another reason why they are supposed to be monitored. Someone should have seen her all over the place on different feeds and either kept an eye on her, or gone to investigate when she never returned from her one way trip. I have a friend that monitored a hotel in Atlantic City. Boring job, but he couldn't perl his eyes away, and when the sensor engaged his screen flashed.
Sent from my XT1650 using Tapatalk
which inherently makes there claim that they have 30 some hours of stuff to go through. totally bogus
If they only go on in an occupied area , from what they have put out, the hotel was a dessert. I what we have seen they have clicked on and off for what 12 seconds at a time - so that is just a flat out lie imo
how do you get 30 hours to look thro if the cameras only come on that way??
IMO The whole release of video of silly . Totally defies any logic . The place has 47 cameras.
How do you end up with her at a stairway and then apparently she becomes invisible to cameras , and floats to another part of the hotel , and then pops in there for 18 seconds, and then floats and pops in suddenly in the kitchen.
We all know there benefit is to tell LE where people were heading .
In one video she just pops out of a wall swish
they claim concretely that this is all they have of her on their system
so she just had to be popping in and out of places in this huge hotel
her popping about becomes even more stunning in that she can pop from the 9th floor to the lobby and then pop down to the lower area
We all know places have cameras in elevators yet they claim what they released is all there is - so apparently she did not use the elevator till she just pops out of it
Superman does that -- people do not .
then they say she was downstairs . People get downstairs or upstairs by stairs but for some reason there is no CCTV of her in any stair well
We know for a fact that the camera in front of the check in desk works and was on.
It is then claimed that they were in the lobby but they say they have no more video
By having no other video of her that has to mean she flew from room 926 to the elevator not being on CCTV from her room.
The kids claim several things. In one account they only took her out of the room , left her there and then lost her -- there is no video of her or them with her
they then claim they all were in front of the desk (where the camera we know works) there is no video of her in front of the desk, with three friends who then turn around and leave her alone and she ends up in some hallway in some part of the facility.
We have seen how long the hallways are in conference areas, there , according to them , is no video of her in or walking in these hallways - she just pops into the kitchen poof
and the public is buying this ....
its like the person exists at 122 then 157 then 212 then 228 but in between who knows
It becomes more ludicrous in light of the fact in the clipping they are stating and proving that cameras in those areas are recording -- yet not in one of them is there any of her entering the scene and then going out of that specific cameras view
she was at a party with around 35 kids - but for some reason they can only locate her in isolated spots totally alone , in a 500 room property, in a major city, on a Friday night, right near the nations biggest airport -- its a crock moo
