MistyWaters
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 2, 2017
- Messages
- 12,003
- Reaction score
- 67,208
Per Dr. Phil interview:
1:30 drop-off
2:07 pictures posted
2:30 approximate time of BG video
3:11 DG called Libby
3:14 DG started walking the trails
3:30 DG could not find, other family called
4:00 MP was called
5:15 Police were called by MP
6:00 Search was on
MP says witness saw suspect "leaving area around that time of day".
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, my point is, he had to have been seen before 3:14. Also, there have been at least 5 people identified as being in the area of the bridge who were questioned.
Perhaps the drawing is not from a witness at all.
How do you draw your conclusion, that perhaps the drawing in not from a witness? For what reason would LE and family lie to the public?
If this witness came forward would their sighting also be disputed?
Otherwise when this case eventually reaches a courtroom, that's quite a significant fabrication that LE would be required to explain. It never bodes well with a jury when LE practises deception for no good reason because how can it be trusted that the other evidence was honestly obtained.