So if I am reading correctly, they didn't find anything specific to dispute the evidence.
>>They reached no conclusion about whether more than one gunman was involved, but urged that authorities conduct a new and complete forensic re-analysis of the five bullet fragments left from the assassination 44 years ago<<
I have never seen anything to make me buy the conpsiracy theory, but I certainly have an open mind.
So if I am reading correctly, they didn't find anything specific to dispute the evidence.
>>They reached no conclusion about whether more than one gunman was involved, but urged that authorities conduct a new and complete forensic re-analysis of the five bullet fragments left from the assassination 44 years ago<<
I have never seen anything to make me buy the conpsiracy theory, but I certainly have an open mind.
One simple question has always haunted me about the JFK assasination: Why did Oswald kill Kennedy?
In any crime, discovering a motive is a primary investigative tool. The Warren Commision says that Oswald was jealous of Kennedy's "youthful vitality" and his great family life, and for that reason, he murdered a president. This reeks of hooey to me. Oswald, for all of the things that can be said about him, did not seem to be crazy. For this to have been his motivation, he would have had to be crazy. Thus, with no motive to kill Kennedy, a logical conclusion would be that he did not kill him. Add to this the mountains of evidence pointing away from him as the lone shooter and it becomes clear that the conspiracy answer is the most logical one.
I am in agreement with this at this point of my own research. There just is no compelling evidence to the contrary IMO.Actually, most recent reinactments and studies by media organizations such as ABC News and the Discovery Channel have shown it is likely he was the lone shooter. It's within the realm of reason and other theories didn't hold up to testing.
I think "if" and "could have" are the operative phrases in this article. My mind is open so if the "could have" is confirmed I will be anxious to hear the rest.There is also this from the article. I think with the statement that you quoted they were just covering their butts.
>>"This finding means that the bullet fragments from the assassination that match could have come from three or more separate bullets," the researchers said.
"If the assassination fragments are derived from three or more separate bullets, then a second assassin is likely, as the additional bullet would not be attributable to the main suspect, Mr. Oswald."<<
Basically they are saying that because the fragments could have come from three or more bullets, then a second assassin would have been involved because only 2 shots were linked to Oswald (if Oswald was even there. Refer to the attached link and you'll see why I have my doubts).
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/RANCHO/POLITICS/JFK/postphotos.html
Actually, most recent reinactments and studies by media organizations such as ABC News and the Discovery Channel have shown it is likely he was the lone shooter. It's within the realm of reason and other theories didn't hold up to testing.
That 3 hour episode along with others are streaming on PBS frontline's site.
You can watch the whole three hours online about Oswald's life..a very good show but why did Oswald just happen to get a job at the
School Book Depository a few weeks before JFK was murdered? And Jack Ruby shooting Oswald...and the President's brain tissue lost and his autopsy notes burned AND the Texas police which include the infamous Henry Wade (of Roe v Wade) took 0 notes when interviewing Oswald for 12 hours.........
This was a coup but we will never know by who or why..............the American people almost never get upset enough to get out in the streets and demand answers...............this was a time when they should have
I'm not a believer in most conspiracy theories, and for the most part, believe them an attempt to explain the unexplainable.
But, in the case of JFK, IF there was a conspiracy, then the one explanation I've heard that could be probable is a mob hit in retaliation for RFK's vendetta and agressive prosecution against the Mafia.
I've really never accepted the "why" of Oswald wanting to kill him. But I don't think any conspiracy will ever be proven.