"A former Damascus College student, who went to the school with Stephenson for two years, said the accused was interested in IT, science and robotics, even comparing him to Elon Musk."
Really good Voluspa. So you could infer that if he had his phone with him at 8am and left it behind later, the attack in the morning may have been more opportunistic than premeditated. I doubt he kept a physical trophy too, apart from footage.
Expansion of Australian-first Technology Detection Dog program
The cost of searches is enormous, as seen by photos: dogs, officers, different means of transport.
Thanks. I can't offer any hunches or opinions regarding this case, other than to say what is an obvious thing, the police have a lot more going on than the public and the media are aware of. Most reporters will have a police contact they deal with formally or informally and may discuss a case, and are respectful of each others role. Very rarely are there any "leaks". (Must be careful here) Police can use some very interesting techniques to obtain information and a lot of it is overt. You wouldn't even know it was happening .Wow, welcome on board Andymoz!I’d be super interested to hear any insights, opinions, hunches, “vibes” etc you may be able to offer Re what could potentially be occurring in the “dance” between media and police?! (hypothetically, theoretically….
Thank you. I know that one but there were other streets searched that were commercial/business in Mount Clear. I just think that search has been overlooked by us. I wish I could remember.
I think how it generally works , is like this. .One gets a discount on the sentence for co operation, and significant demonstrations of remorse, and regret, and apology for the offending. And no doubt about it, Murder is offensive. One's eligibility for a discount on the sentence is dramatically reduced the more intractable and recalcitrant one is once arrested.
Thank you. I knew one began with an E. Elsworth. I think we have overlooked this search as there has been no more mention of it. Did the accused hide Samantha in a lock-up in one of those streets for a few hours whilst he sobered up and developed a plan in his head to dispose of her body? Just some thoughts of mine.
He could not know how much time he had, really. He had no way of knowing that the ladies at the brunch would set up a hue and cry, so whatever he did, he did without any foreknowledge of how much time he actually had to accomplish everything he had to do.
I could have sworn someone posted an article on how bodies decompose in different locations, but I've gone back through the entire thread and can't find reference to it. Perhaps I googled on my own? Regardless, what I recall from the article is a body in water leaves less clues than one in the elements, but clues can still be gained after a reasonable amount of time.
He didn't need to know about people raising the alarm. He had just murdered Samantha and needed time for himself to think of a plan and sober up imo.
It has not been established that he was drunk. People kill other people stone cold sober, all the time. Daily, around the world. No one knows if he was using other mind altering substances either, at this point, but it is an understandable reaction to think the must have been to do such a thing, but it is not necessarily so. He may have been , in his own mind, clear as a bell, and operating with all faculties at peak.
Yes I agree. I wonder is his obstinacy to speak to the police due to protecting someone else? More will be revealed with time.
