I do believe the State should also have sanctions when it's all said and done. I think that is fair and following the law.
What I am trying to wrap my brain around is this part of that article:
“The Defense is concerned that there will be a continual drip, drip, drip of evidence (much which could be exculpatory in nature) unless a discovery deadline is set by the Court,”
Attorneys for Delphi murders defendant ask judge to stop 'drip, drip, drip' of evidence
So the discovery that is late is the entire investigation of 5.5 years. Let's say all evidence against RA is on 3 of the hard drives. Shouldn't they concentrate on that to build the defense? Instead of asking for every single tip and interview to possibly-maybe-hopefully find something exculpatory?