I asked about this in my post on pg 3,I think,but no takers.
I'll restate...Katie Sue R. was supposed to have an interview with LE and didn't show up/When they went to her she refused to be interviewed but referred them to Vicky A. KSR told LE Vicky A. knew Casey much better.I think both lived at Sawgrass.I don't recall seeing an interview with Vicky A in the docs.I'm wondering if she is connected somehow to Casey learning the name.That's why I was asking about who J morgan might depose or call as a witness.
If LE has a link from someone to the name ZFG,to KC,they can prove she simply made the nanny up.Nanny defense closed.
Miss James, sorry this was missed the first time. Someone at SawGrass could have given KC the information about ZG. KC used the 2 other names from the form as Zani's roommates, possibly without knowing these were ZG's children. I just don't think using a name is the same as pointing a finger at a picture or a person to implicate them. As 'different' as the name Zenaida is, there was a person with this name who was due to graduate with KC in 2004, she apparently has a sibling named Samantha who graduated in 2003.
There are too many other ways of obtaining information about people today. Look at the personal information we have seen on the people involved in this case. DL#'s SSN's, DOB, addresses with phone numbers, employers, even payroll And this information was handed to us! We didn't even to search for it!!
Obviously KC doesn't have a broad enough imagination to make up names for her imaginary friends. But, using a real name for an imaginary person does not make the imaginary person any more real. It's not adding a little truth to her lies to use 'real names'.
It is interesting to me that a former coworker from universal and Ricardo were both aware of KC's friends and 'former coworkers' JH and JL. Richardo was even familiar with the name of KC's boss IIRC. This does not make the imaginary friends any more real, than the position of event planner at Universal make KC's "job" real.
KC uses people, real and imaginary, people are only as important as the needs they fill. Once the need is fulfilled the people (both real and imaginary) are disposed of, with no thought to the damage she leaves behind. JL, JH, ZFG are all imaginary people KC made up to fill her needs. CA wanted KC to be more responsible for Caylee, to be less a party girl and a better mother so KC invents JH, a single dad with a young son. JH with his son Zach, lives with his parents in Jacksonville. They would have made the perfect little family. Very respectable, close enough for weekend trips but too far for CA to drop in on. We haven't heard much about JL, after all she relocated to NY, shortly before KC hooked up with TonE, but I'll bet KC and JL had a lot of late night or overnight play dates when KC wanted to spend some time with her boy toys. (CA must have choked when she discovered just how many 'boyfriends' KC had been through just between May and July). KC needed someone to watch Caylee while she went to her imaginary job, she worked a lot of late night events so 'just any babysitter' wouldn't do; in walks Zani the Nanny aka ZFG.
ZG is no more Zani the nanny, than JH was KC's new boyfriend.
Since the trial is presently scheduled for March and a 90 or 120 day delay in the deposition schedule is not going to cause ZG irreparable harm, there is simply no reason for Judge Rodriguez to push the issue. He will grant a reasonable extension of time to Baez and Morgan will have to deal with it.
Frankly, I do not think that ZG can prevail in her case in chief. Her ex-employer would have to take the stand and say that ZG's employment was terminated BECAUSE of the Caylee Anthony case and for no other reason, as would a spokesperson from ANY and ALL companies with whom she applied for employment and was denied. If ZG was fired from her cleaning job, the reason for termination will be in her employment record. I just do not see anyone entering "has the same name as Caylee Anthony's phantom Nanny" as the cause for termination. And if her termination were the result of such and her records reflected this information, she would be on unemployment. Since employment laws vary by State and I do not know how Florida's laws work, I can only assume it is an "employment at will" State, meaning that one can be terminated without reason - at the will of the employer. If it isn't, she would be suing her employer for firing her for such a ridiculous reason. Sorry, but I do not believe anyone will swear under oath that ZG was a perfect candidate for a position with their company, but was not hired because of her name being associated with the case.
On top of this, KC was shown a photo of ZG and said that this was not ZFG. ZG is not ZFG, there is no Fernandes(z) hyphen anything. KC said ZFG had no kids, ZG has 6. KC's description of ZFG could in no way be construed to be ZG. The link between KC's imaginary Nanny and ZG is tenuous if not remote. KC at no time implicated THIS particular woman.
Respectfully snipped for space.
ITA with everything you wrote. People with no money don't bring law suits against other people with no money to "clear their name", this type of suit is only brought when there is the hope of a big pay out. When ZG gave her statement to OCSD she listed her home address as Motel 6. Evidentially ZFG was having a bad year before KC came along.
I do not want to sound like I have no sympathy for ZG. I do. She didn't ask for her name to be brought into this. But I have a very hard time believing she lost her job or was denied employment due to anyone thinking she was Zani the nanny.
