Did she ever turn over her notebooks from the case (which she was withholding)?
so the coroner was either paid off or warned that very first day.wow! and yes I do believe that...this was a child murder,for goodness sake,he KNEW better,and he KNEW proper procedures yet he did not follow them.
But then it had to be done quickly- there had to be that open coffin, complete with frozen-in-time perfect (Patsy's words) little Beauty Queen wearing gorgeous pageant dress and tiara.
The position of coroner varies from district to district. In some cases, a coroner is appointed. In others, it is an elected position. Not sure about this case, but if he was appointed by the DA, he may have been classified as an "at will" employee (meaning he can be fired at any time, without cause). If he was "encouraged" not to delve too deeply, it isn't hard to figure out the correlation between the sloppy procedures and the unemployment line.
Coroners are not always medical examiners, either. But I think Mayer was (meaning he was an MD). There was also another medical examiner in Boulder, but we don't hear much about her in relation to this case. I have read that she also examined JB.
I keep thinking of the police wanting Mayer to keep the body longer, in case there was something that may have been missed. Like the alleged "stun gun marks". That could have been studied further, making the exhumation question a moot point. It was anyway- the Rs refused and the DA (who could have asked a judge for a warrant, overriding the parents' wishes) also refused. Mayer also refused to examine the body further.
I know the DA's office accused the police of wanting to "ransom the body" by holding her until the Rs were interviewed. I am not saying there might not have been some of that thinking. But JB got released and buried pretty fast, for an unsolved murder. But then it had to be done quickly- there had to be that open coffin, complete with frozen-in-time perfect (Patsy's words) little Beauty Queen wearing gorgeous pageant dress and tiara.
me too, Deedee,I just wonder if it was a threatening warning..as in..'do this.. or else'.she was left there all day long,not to mention,the nail clippers blunder...all basic things ignored or done improperly.
The position of coroner varies from district to district. In some cases, a coroner is appointed. In others, it is an elected position. Not sure about this case, but if he was appointed by the DA, he may have been classified as an "at will" employee (meaning he can be fired at any time, without cause). If he was "encouraged" not to delve too deeply, it isn't hard to figure out the correlation between the sloppy procedures and the unemployment line.
Coroners are not always medical examiners, either. But I think Mayer was (meaning he was an MD). There was also another medical examiner in Boulder, but we don't hear much about her in relation to this case. I have read that she also examined JB.
That will be a real mess.
There was pressure at the impact point but it is unlikely that would cause a long, wide split unless a second nearly simultaneous injury occurred at or nearly at the same time, causing two fractures to join.
You might also want to try hitting a coconut with a hammer just enough to cause a depression and fracture. Then put the coconut on the counter and press down with your hand, putting your weight behind it. The fracture will widen and lengthen (or at least it should!!!) because of the relatively high pressure on the coconut (and other reasons but I'm too tired to get into that again tonight ) Then try hitting a second coconut with all your might and see what the hammer does and how it fractures. It is a rather gruesome experiment but it helps understand JonBenet's wounds.
Just bumping this thread since the head wound discussion seems to be popular again.
The entire head wound suggests, to me, a low-velocity/high-impact injury.
Thank you for bumping this!
Could you give an example of a low-velocity/high-impact scenario that might fit JB's case?
Thank you for bumping this!
Could you give an example of a low-velocity/high-impact scenario that might fit JB's case?
A low-velocity/high-pressure wound could possibly come from being pushed and falling onto something such as a faucet fixture or bathtub edge or door knob, any of which are relatively slow-speed movements, relatively driven by a lot of force (high pressure) directed onto one small, specific area.
A bullet wound would be an opposite example (high-velocity/low-pressure wound). The bullet is very speedy with little pressure as it enters the target.
How about a child, whose head is on the floor, being pushed down and held firmly around the throat with one hand and the butt of a hand gun brought down on the skull by the other hand?
I don't know that being a child rather than being an adult would make a difference, but other than that part of your statement, yes, that would be an example of a low-velocity/high-pressure wound.
If you are specifically referring to JonBenet Ramsey, then there should be hand-finger imprints on her neck. I don't believe the autopsy reported such evidence of manual strangulation nor did the photos as shown on-line. The autopsy states ligature strangulation with accompanying head trauma (or words to that effect).
No no, I didn't mean to imply that she was strangled with the hand, just held down, no need for the fingers to dig in and leave marks.
My question was only addressed to the specific low-velocity/high-pressure nature and the possibility of this being caused by a blow from a pistol butt to the head of someone who was being held firmly on the floor. I mentioned the child as I believe a child's skull would be easier to fracture than an adults, being as bone density/mass would be less.
In the book PMPT,it says JB's body was tented and sprayed with super glue (or like substance),and one lone fingerprint was lifted from it.It doesn't say who's it was though.
But like the spots found on the pieces of carpet removed by JB's bed...no one is talking about what the evidence showed.