http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2011/04...ch-for-bodies-off-l-i-in-serial-killer-probe/
"Gilbert, a prostitute from Jersey City, was last seen in May by Long Island doctor Peter Hackett, who said he saw Gilbert running at night near Oak Beach, looking both sick and distressed.
These people need closure and we need to find this girl if she is alive, he said."
You would have thought that when the reporter got this quote from him (above: "These people need closure...") that he would have taken the opportunity to clear up the other statement about seeing her looking both sick and distressed had he not actually made the statement.
A big part of this story that many on WS are missing is that over the course of events in Oak Beach we have statements from witnesses (and non-credible people who aren't actually witnesses "I saw her footprints in the sand heading that way") that illustrate the promotion of an agenda. There are documented statements from residents that show a complete change in their story, version of the events, and statements that are contradictory to facts we now have including but not limited to the location of SG's remains. Clearly, she wasn't running in the sand towards the water, and clearly she did not fall of the jetty, hit her head and drowned. These are some of the statements/speculation made by "witnesses".
In hindsight it is now easy to confirm that some "witnesses" were being intentionally deceitful.