norest4thewicked
True Crime Writer
My husband just came up with this interesting scenario and I thought I would share it.
Would the state open up the case now and investigate George's part in this? If Casey and George were both there when Caylee died, maybe they should put her on the stand and ask her what she witnessed. You can't have it both ways. If they both were there, (supposedly) why can't they investigate this? If the jury found her guilty because of "some horrible accident that got out of control" then why shouldn't he be investigated. There is still a dead child and no one is being held responsible.
Why or why not do you think they would do this?
Would the state open up the case now and investigate George's part in this? If Casey and George were both there when Caylee died, maybe they should put her on the stand and ask her what she witnessed. You can't have it both ways. If they both were there, (supposedly) why can't they investigate this? If the jury found her guilty because of "some horrible accident that got out of control" then why shouldn't he be investigated. There is still a dead child and no one is being held responsible.
Why or why not do you think they would do this?