I have a sick feeling ZG will not be collecting any money here. Because Casey will have a built up mental insanity situation by then. Her therapy sessions could make this possible. Casey being mentally not responsible for her actions at the time. Because of Caylee's death. With a couple sick therapists backing that view up. Then the deposition may never happen. As in just not worth it from Murray's point of view. In this crazy court case, this may well happen. And these therapy BS sessions may only be a deflection against all civil suits. Oh how I hope I am wrong here, but........
IMO, all KC's attorneys have to say is that ZFG was made up, game over. MOO. It is a "ruined reputation" lawsuit for 15,000. I am sure there are many people with that name and they are not filing lawsuits. If someone said I left my child with Mark Jones, or Mary Jones, Hypothetically,what evidence is there that one didleave a child a with Mark Jones or Mary Jones? The case has no merit, there is no evidence linking KC to a ZFG, only KC's statement which KC admitted was a lie. ZFG never lived at Sawgrass apartments.
Let me put this another way as so many seem to think this lawsuit will go somewhere:
My name is Mary Jones, some nutcase says that I was a caretaker for a person later found dead. The nutcase has no info on how to contact me, no correspondance whatsoever. No link back to me.
How in the world could/would a court find that the nutcase meant me?
It is all speculation on M&M's view, IMO.
I do believe it will go nowhere. Think about it........if someone threw your name out there, and it is a common name, would you be out there claiming your reputation was ruined?
ZFG (especially in the latin community) is a very common name. How do M&M prove she meant this ZFG? Frivolous. MOO
Respectfully here to you all. But I feel that ZG should be suing Cindy. It was Casey who in jail told the police that the woman in the picture they showed her WAS NOT ZG. But that night, Cindy went on national TV and stated that this ZG in question was the right one! And that statement was made after Casey informed Cindy the police had showed her a picture of the wrong ZG. Now it gets tricky. Cindy said she was speaking as Casey's representative on TV.
The bottom line is that Cindy is the one who sent the dogs after ZG after Casey had cleared her. So why is Cindy not being sued here???
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/new...y-letter-to-judge-in-Casey-Anthony-civil-case
Woman writes angry letter to judge in Casey Anthony civil case
http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/angry-letter-to-judge-munyon-0804.pdf
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/new...y-letter-to-judge-in-Casey-Anthony-civil-case
Woman writes angry letter to judge in Casey Anthony civil case
http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/angry-letter-to-judge-munyon-0804.pdf
Also Casey, in the written depo, answered the question, "Is the person in the attached picture, the Zenaida Gonzalez you claim had Caylee the last time you saw her", with the fifth amendment. She had the opportunity to clear Zenaida's name then (January 2009), she did not.Respectfully here to you all. But I feel that ZG should be suing Cindy. It was Casey who in jail told the police that the woman in the picture they showed her WAS NOT ZG. But that night, Cindy went on national TV and stated that this ZG in question was the right one! And that statement was made after Casey informed Cindy the police had showed her a picture of the wrong ZG. Now it gets tricky. Cindy said she was speaking as Casey's representative on TV.
The bottom line is that Cindy is the one who sent the dogs after ZG after Casey had cleared her. So why is Cindy not being sued here???
IMO, all KC's attorneys have to say is that ZFG was made up, game over. MOO. It is a "ruined reputation" lawsuit for 15,000. I am sure there are many people with that name and they are not filing lawsuits. If someone said I left my child with Mark Jones, or Mary Jones, Hypothetically,what evidence is there that one didleave a child a with Mark Jones or Mary Jones? The case has no merit, there is no evidence linking KC to a ZFG, only KC's statement which KC admitted was a lie. ZFG never lived at Sawgrass apartments.
Let me put this another way as so many seem to think this lawsuit will go somewhere:
My name is Mary Jones, some nutcase says that I was a caretaker for a person later found dead. The nutcase has no info on how to contact me, no correspondance whatsoever. No link back to me.
How in the world could/would a court find that the nutcase meant me?
It is all speculation on M&M's view, IMO.
I do believe it will go nowhere. Think about it........if someone threw your name out there, and it is a common name, would you be out there claiming your reputation was ruined?
ZFG (especially in the latin community) is a very common name. How do M&M prove she meant this ZFG? Frivolous. MOO
IMO, all KC's attorneys have to say is that ZFG was made up, game over. MOO. It is a "ruined reputation" lawsuit for 15,000. I am sure there are many people with that name and they are not filing lawsuits. If someone said I left my child with Mark Jones, or Mary Jones, Hypothetically,what evidence is there that one didleave a child a with Mark Jones or Mary Jones? The case has no merit, there is no evidence linking KC to a ZFG, only KC's statement which KC admitted was a lie. ZFG never lived at Sawgrass apartments.
Let me put this another way as so many seem to think this lawsuit will go somewhere:
My name is Mary Jones, some nutcase says that I was a caretaker for a person later found dead. The nutcase has no info on how to contact me, no correspondance whatsoever. No link back to me.
How in the world could/would a court find that the nutcase meant me?
It is all speculation on M&M's view, IMO.
I do believe it will go nowhere. Think about it........if someone threw your name out there, and it is a common name, would you be out there claiming your reputation was ruined?
ZFG (especially in the latin community) is a very common name. How do M&M prove she meant this ZFG? Frivolous. MOO
-----snipped-----
It is all speculation on M&M's view, IMO.
I do believe it will go nowhere. Think about it........if someone threw your name out there, and it is a common name, would you be out there claiming your reputation was ruined?
ZFG (especially in the latin community) is a very common name. How do M&M prove she meant this ZFG? Frivolous. MOO
Respectfully here to you all. But I feel that ZG should be suing Cindy. It was Casey who in jail told the police that the woman in the picture they showed her WAS NOT ZG. But that night, Cindy went on national TV and stated that this ZG in question was the right one! And that statement was made after Casey informed Cindy the police had showed her a picture of the wrong ZG. Now it gets tricky. Cindy said she was speaking as Casey's representative on TV.
The bottom line is that Cindy is the one who sent the dogs after ZG after Casey had cleared her. So why is Cindy not being sued here???
I've always thought that Cindy was just as liable as Casey in regards to ZG. Cindy did indeed go on television and make the point that the woman was the right one.
I think ZG's lawsuit should include Cindy, not only because of that one statement on television, but she also continuously promoted the story that ZFG kidnapped Caylee long after Casey had been arrested and was sitting in jail not talking. Cindy kept throwing in details, saying that she had phone numbers for ZFG and had given them to LE. She said that Zanny had a puppy and that Caylee had talked about playing with Zanny's puppy.
The bottom line is that Cindy kept the "Zanny the nanny kidnapped Caylee" story in the headlines for many months after Casey went to jail.
http://www.cfnews13.com/article/new...y-letter-to-judge-in-Casey-Anthony-civil-case
Woman writes angry letter to judge in Casey Anthony civil case
http://www.cfnews13.com/static/articles/images/documents/angry-letter-to-judge-munyon-0804.pdf