"The DNA on the underwear may be from the killer, but it may not be," Bennett said. "It's minute DNA, like from a cough or sneeze. ... You can't just jump to conclusion it's positive proof that will trace back to the killer."
This is the point where an innocent John Ramsey would raise hell and start yelling, "WAIT A MINUTE! - If the DNA might not be from the killer why are you eliminating suspects based on the DNA?!!!... All those people you eliminated should still be suspects if the DNA is not related to the crime!!!... Your investigation is FLAWED!!!"
This is how an innocent parent would react to Tom Bennett's statement. But you won't hear that coming from mouth of John Ramsey. He wants to continue hiding behind the myth that the DNA belongs to the killer - because it's the best way of pointing the crime away from his guilty family.
Time and time again, it's what those damn Ramseys DON'T say that proves their involvement in JonBenet's death...
This is the point where an innocent John Ramsey would raise hell and start yelling, "WAIT A MINUTE! - If the DNA might not be from the killer why are you eliminating suspects based on the DNA?!!!... All those people you eliminated should still be suspects if the DNA is not related to the crime!!!... Your investigation is FLAWED!!!"
This is how an innocent parent would react to Tom Bennett's statement. But you won't hear that coming from mouth of John Ramsey. He wants to continue hiding behind the myth that the DNA belongs to the killer - because it's the best way of pointing the crime away from his guilty family.
Time and time again, it's what those damn Ramseys DON'T say that proves their involvement in JonBenet's death...