894 users online (165 members and 729 guests)  


Websleuths News


Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 256
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    29

    Question The ransom note

    Dont get me wrong I think one of the Ramseys penned the ransom note, but Ive always thought it was wierd that there were no tears found on the paper, think about this, with all that went on that night how could anyone be composed, and not in a state of chaos, and yet be be able to pen a ransom note that was pristine?

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by terralee
    Dont get me wrong I think one of the Ramseys penned the ransom note, but Ive always thought it was wierd that there were no tears found on the paper, think about this, with all that went on that night how could anyone be composed, and not in a state of chaos, and yet be be able to pen a ransom note that was pristine?
    Remember that there were quite a few pages missing in Patsy's notepad. Who's to say she didn't cry on the paper, tore it up and began again.
    ...We have said to ourselves, look, there is never going to be a victory in this, there is no victory...John Ramsey: 6/24/98

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NSW Australia
    Posts
    9,182
    What's wierder is there being no prints on the note.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    13,720
    Not even a crease in the paper........

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NSW Australia
    Posts
    9,182
    Did Patsy say she picked up the note?
    Or did she just read it as it was layed out on the stair?
    I can't remember...John apparently knelt down and read it.
    He was supposedly reading it to her whilst she rang 911...was that from where it lay on the stairs?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    749

    Smile

    Quote Originally Posted by narlacat
    Did Patsy say she picked up the note?
    Or did she just read it as it was layed out on the stair?
    I can't remember...John apparently knelt down and read it.
    He was supposedly reading it to her whilst she rang 911...was that from where it lay on the stairs?
    I believe she said she picked it up because they found her fingerprints on it and she was like duh, I picked it up, that's why it had fingerprints on it. but, i don't know if she picked it up to read it or picked it up to show the officers or john.
    not sure about that one. If she read it standing up, looking at it on the stairs, she had great eyesight!!!

    nighty night

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    13,720

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    342
    Quote Originally Posted by narlacat
    Did Patsy say she picked up the note?
    Or did she just read it as it was layed out on the stair?
    I can't remember...John apparently knelt down and read it.
    He was supposedly reading it to her whilst she rang 911...was that from where it lay on the stairs?
    I would certainly have picked it up. I would want to read it very carefully. So, if in fact there are no prints on the note, then it is very suspicious. Are we sure that there are no prints whatsoever or just none that are discernible.

    As for tears, I would expect them somewhere on the note (even the tiniest) if indeed Patsy had penned that note, after the fact. I think the note just reeks of anger; no sorrow. To me, it seems to have been written before. If it was written after, then it was written by someone so callous and disconnected.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NSW Australia
    Posts
    9,182
    Ok, well maybe I was wrong about no prints on the note..god I've been on the case less than 18 months and I'm forgetting stuff already
    I'm not sure Rupert, maybe someone else knows?
    Thanks for the link Dingo.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Three things cannot be long hidden: the sun, the moon, and the truth. Buddha
    Posts
    22,099
    Quote Originally Posted by narlacat
    Did Patsy say she picked up the note?
    Or did she just read it as it was layed out on the stair?
    I can't remember...John apparently knelt down and read it.
    He was supposedly reading it to her whilst she rang 911...was that from where it lay on the stairs?
    She said she picked it up. John on the other hand said he got down on all fours and spread it out to read it. In his underwear no less.

    A partial of Patsy's palm was on either on the note or the note pad but not her finger prints.
    Websleuths is TEMPORARILY accepting donations.

    CLICK HERE
    to visit our GoFundMe page

    OR











  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    NSW Australia
    Posts
    9,182
    Thanks Tricia.
    I remember John kneeling down in his underwear, ooohh what a horrible thought
    So, did John touch it?
    As if he wouldn't have just knelt down and scooped it up as quick as he could...

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,670
    Quote Originally Posted by Rupert
    If it was written after, then it was written by someone so callous and disconnected.
    I think that's just what the note writer (I think it was Patsy) is: callous, because she valued her own reputation higher than bringing justice to the daughter she accidentally killed. She is callous because instead of turning herself in to the police, she has been able to live with that horrible lie.
    And John is just as callous because he obviously went along with it.

    Patsy is tough as nails. One need only read her interview with Tom Haney, and how she tries to intimidate him by condescendingly calling him 'bud'.

    She wanted to save her sorry hide which is why she had the nerve to write that ransom note. I don't even think she shed a single tear while writing it, because at that stage it was probably the adrenaline rush in her system which prevented her fom crying.

  13. #13
    sharpar's Avatar
    sharpar is offline If dogs dont go to heaven I want to go where they are
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Home of the Alamo
    Posts
    1,282
    In order to cry, you would have to admit what you have done and then
    apply a moral code to it . When you are in denial an justify and rationalize what you have done then no need for those bothersome guilt feelings .
    I had to because ___________ and its all her fault anyways .

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    4,807
    Quote Originally Posted by rashomon
    I think that's just what the note writer (I think it was Patsy) is: callous, because she valued her own reputation higher than bringing justice to the daughter she accidentally killed. She is callous because instead of turning herself in to the police, she has been able to live with that horrible lie.
    And John is just as callous because he obviously went along with it.

    Patsy is tough as nails. One need only read her interview with Tom Haney, and how she tries to intimidate him by condescendingly calling him 'bud'.

    She wanted to save her sorry hide which is why she had the nerve to write that ransom note. I don't even think she shed a single tear while writing it, because at that stage it was probably the adrenaline rush in her system which prevented her fom crying.
    Hi Rash,

    How are you? Love reading your posts. I agree with you 1000% Patsy is strong as steel; this is not to say she wishes it did not happen, but it is not going to destroy her life - A reporter asked her "you must be going crazy" and she replied "I am not going crazy for anyone". She is tough as nails. I hear she is free of the cancer again, but am not sure what I am reading is accurate.

    I have a question for you. Was reading Wecht's book and he is convinced from the small amount of blood in JB's skull that the crushing took place after the strangulation since her heart had virtually stopped. HOWEVER, Steve Thomas in his book says "there was massive hemmorhaging". I read the autopsy and it agrees with Wecht although it also says there was "extensive hemmorhaging" under the skull (I think under the skull - could be wrong - but it was in the area of the assault on her head. What do you think?

    Another thing, I was reading the interview that Barbara Walters did with them (John and Patsy) and she asked why they never took a poly and they replied "we were never asked". She lets them off the hook, because ST says he did ask her, (but I did read his transcript and he says "I am not asking you but how would you do with a poly". So I am still trying to find out if they were asked to take it. PM/PT author Schiller says they were asked, but according to the transcripts they were only "alluded to". Can you help with that?

    Rash, I am obsessed by this case and I think I am obsessed because of the absolute violence of it all. In looking at JB's skull, I am still speechless. In reading the note, I am shocked that Patsy has the audacity to think she can get away with it (to write such a long one), but then she has, hasn't she. But she has audacity to even contemplate it.

    And in the back of my mind I am still wondering every once in a while, because the crime is so horrific; and then I remember, oh yes, they tell lies when none are needed and that tells me so much. Usually when people are lying, it is a part of something bigger. They both tell lies that really there is no need to, but apparently they feel there is.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    1,670
    Quote Originally Posted by Solace
    Hi Rash,

    How are you? Love reading your posts. I agree with you 1000% Patsy is strong as steel; this is not to say she wishes it did not happen, but it is not going to destroy her life - A reporter asked her "you must be going crazy" and she replied "I am not going crazy for anyone". She is tough as nails. I hear she is free of the cancer again, but am not sure what I am reading is accurate.

    I have a question for you. Was reading Wecht's book and he is convinced from the small amount of blood in JB's skull that the crushing took place after the strangulation since her heart had virtually stopped. HOWEVER, Steve Thomas in his book says "there was massive hemmorhaging". I read the autopsy and it agrees with Wecht although it also says there was "extensive hemmorhaging" under the skull (I think under the skull - could be wrong - but it was in the area of the assault on her head. What do you think?

    Another thing, I was reading the interview that Barbara Walters did with them (John and Patsy) and she asked why they never took a poly and they replied "we were never asked". She lets them off the hook, because ST says he did ask her, (but I did read his transcript and he says "I am not asking you but how would you do with a poly". So I am still trying to find out if they were asked to take it. PM/PT author Schiller says they were asked, but according to the transcripts they were only "alluded to". Can you help with that?

    Rash, I am obsessed by this case and I think I am obsessed because of the absolute violence of it all. In looking at JB's skull, I am still speechless. In reading the note, I am shocked that Patsy has the audacity to think she can get away with it (to write such a long one), but then she has, hasn't she. But she has audacity to even contemplate it.

    And in the back of my mind I am still wondering every once in a while, because the crime is so horrific; and then I remember, oh yes, they tell lies when none are needed and that tells me so much. Usually when people are lying, it is a part of something bigger. They both tell lies that really there is no need to, but apparently they feel there is.
    Hi Solace, great to see you posting here! When we got into our off-topic talk about the JBR case on another forum, I thought how great it would be if you could become a poster on the JB forums on the net, and it is so good to see you over here - you ask such pivotal questions about this case, and have already read much more than I, who have just started reading PMPT after finishing ST's book.
    In terms of your question re the bleeding inside JB's skull: I haven't read Wecht's book (did he actually write a book about the case?), but this is what I read about Dr. Meyer's autopsy report (PMPT pb, p. 156/157) [bold type mine]:

    "The next thing Meyer noted in is report was a fracture of the skull that had not be visible before he removed part of the skull. There was subdural hemorrhaging over the surface of the right cerebral hemisphere and a thin film of subarachnoid hemorrhaging over the whole right cerebral hemisphere. In the report, he wrote about an extensive purple bruise, about 8 by 1 3/4 inches in area, underlying the skull fracture, as well as a bruise at the tip of the right temporal lobe measuring about 1/4 inch square."
    And I think that this is what Steve Thomas meant by 'extensive hemorrhaging' of the brain, because the surface below the skull where bleeding was noted was indeed extensive: 8 by 1 3/4 inches.
    And doesn't an amount of bleeding like that show even to laypeople that the damage done to JB's brain was horrendous?

    Which is why I'd like to read Wecht's book. What is the exact title?

    Rash, I am obsessed by this case and I think I am obsessed because of the absolute violence of it all. In looking at JB's skull, I am still speechless. In reading the note, I am shocked that Patsy has the audacity to think she can get away with it (to write such a long one), but then she has, hasn't she. But she has audacity to even contemplate it.
    Is it a wonder that people are obsessed by this case? A case were in the initial investigation everything that could go wrong, went wrong?
    A case which will probably never see the inside of a courtroom because the affluent perps (I'll call them perps because I think (for whatever reason) John helped Patsy with the cover-up) lawyered up with top-flight attorneys right from the start, and a spineless DA let himself be intimidated by them?
    This strategy seems to be working down to the present day. The Ramseys' aggressive attack-dog lawyer Lin Wood sued everyone who tried to challenge the Ramseys. So it it seems that even judges were afraid of that big-mouthed lawyer. What a shame!

    Re the ransom note: I think when Patsy's wrote the ransom note she was operating on some kind of psychological 'auto-pilot': the damage had been done, nothing would bring her daughter back, and she just threw everything into that note which in her opinion would point away from the parents as the perps.

    In terms of the polygraph, maybe the other posters know more about it.
    I vaguely remember reading that the Ramseys did take a polygraph after all, but only by a polygrapher they themselves had chosen after their results of a previous polygraph had turned out not to be in their favor. But I'm not sure, so anyone correct me if I'm wrong.

Page 1 of 18 1 2 3 11 ... LastLast


Similar Threads

  1. My take on the ransom note...
    By JMO8778 in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 05-12-2008, 10:08 PM
  2. S.B.T.C. / Ransom Note Merged
    By englishleigh in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 363
    Last Post: 08-25-2006, 03:28 PM
  3. Ransom note...have you ever considered...
    By calus_3 in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 06-21-2005, 03:53 PM
  4. Just a Ransom Note Quiz
    By Camper in forum JonBenet Ramsey
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-13-2004, 02:27 PM