MI MI - Jessica Heeringa, 25, Norton Shores, 26 April 2013 #8

Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone who remembers, refresh my memory please..wasn't the manager's brother supposedly Jessica's boyfriend who wanted her to share an apartment with him. And didn't she allegedly turn him down? And didn't he allegedly visit her at the store earlier that evening??
 
Someone who remembers, refresh my memory please..wasn't the manager's brother supposedly Jessica's boyfriend who wanted her to share an apartment with him. And didn't she allegedly turn him down? And didn't he allegedly visit her at the store earlier that evening??

Yes, yes and yes. And he wasn't the only boyfriend/ex-boyfriend who was there that night. JA was there in his work van too.
 
SteveP, the official timeline, with all its flaws, was issued to the public four months ago. It mentions the silver van multiple times. Until that timeline is deemed inaccurate by someone in a position of authority then I have no choice but to follow it. And, of course, try to discredit it. I would also mention that different websites publicizing the disappearance of Jessica continue to mention the silver van. And this website, Websleuths.com, in its official version of events continues to embrace the silver van. So, until that changes, I'd say the silver van is front and center to people who continue to investigate this case. Now, if you choose to reject it, perfectly fine to me--we can talk about it. But at least to LE, I think it's still seen as an element of the crime.

However, if you want to talk about the silver van, and it's possible irrelevancy to the crime, I have a question: If the manager and her husband are involved, why admit they saw anything? It's a question I ask myself and I'm not sure I have the answer despite me pointing out several things about her actions that night that seem suspicious.

Had the manager said she saw nothing would've been surely safer than identifying some random vehicle that's going down Grand Haven. True, the driver of the van nor the van in those security videos has been found. But the manager wouldn't have known that at the time--There's no way she could've predicted that the driver of a random vehicle she picked out--a silver T&C--wouldn't come forward when the van was publicized all over western Michigan.

In fact, if that's exactly what she did, the manager has to be the luckiest co-conspirator I've ever heard of since she picked a driver who has chosen to remain anonymous. What if the driver comes forward and says, "Yep, that's me. That's my van. I had my two daughters in the car. We were coming back from the movies." What then? It just about automatically shows the manager is involved. Better to keep your mouth shut and everyone think you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.

Having said all this, I think this is all putting the cart before the horse. The key is figuring out if the manager could see what she said she saw that night. Not WHAT she saw but if it was physically possible to do so. My belief is she exaggerated her story--seeing the van as far away as she did, etc.. But exaggeration isn't a crime. But if someone can prove she exaggerated, then the police can start to give her a harder time about the rest of the facts.
 
It was a worker that called 911 after finishing his shift at 11pm, and finding no one there. Video at link is worth watching again.

Harpster said he stopped at the gas station after getting off work about 11 p.m. When he walked inside, no one was there

http://www.wzzm13.com/news/article/254799/2/Police-Jessica-Heeringa-likely-knew-abductor


The 911 call and what he observes in the parking lot.

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2013/04/29/911-call-released-in-connection-with-norton-shores-abduction/

Thanks, the guy that made the 911 call said that he stopped there at least 2 times a week at that same time. He said that Jessica was a "hard worker" and would be outside washing windows or cleaning up at that time of night. So if the abductor watched Jessica he knew that too. Maybe he just sat out back because he knew she would be opening that back door any moment to take that trash out and he just grabbed her as soon as she opened the door.
Also wondering about the other car he saw.. a Honda SUV? He saw one car close to the building and then the SUV. One was Jessica's, who had a car there? He said no one else was there but there were 2 cars left there, or maybe the "one out front" did have a customer.
 
It was a worker that called 911 after finishing his shift at 11pm, and finding no one there. Video at link is worth watching again.

Harpster said he stopped at the gas station after getting off work about 11 p.m. When he walked inside, no one was there

http://www.wzzm13.com/news/article/254799/2/Police-Jessica-Heeringa-likely-knew-abductor


The 911 call and what he observes in the parking lot.

http://detroit.cbslocal.com/2013/04/29/911-call-released-in-connection-with-norton-shores-abduction/

He believes he got there at 11:07; looked in the store then went outside to look around for her before calling 911 at 11:15.
To me; the other car(s) sound like others may have pulled in for gas too
 
SteveP, the official timeline, with all its flaws, was issued to the public four months ago. It mentions the silver van multiple times. Until that timeline is deemed inaccurate by someone in a position of authority then I have no choice but to follow it. And, of course, try to discredit it. I would also mention that different websites publicizing the disappearance of Jessica continue to mention the silver van. And this website, Websleuths.com, in its official version of events continues to embrace the silver van. So, until that changes, I'd say the silver van is front and center to people who continue to investigate this case. Now, if you choose to reject it, perfectly fine to me--we can talk about it. But at least to LE, I think it's still seen as an element of the crime.

However, if you want to talk about the silver van, and it's possible irrelevancy to the crime, I have a question: If the manager and her husband are involved, why admit they saw anything? It's a question I ask myself and I'm not sure I have the answer despite me pointing out several things about her actions that night that seem suspicious.

Had the manager said she saw nothing would've been surely safer than identifying some random vehicle that's going down Grand Haven. True, the driver of the van nor the van in those security videos has been found. But the manager wouldn't have known that at the time--There's no way she could've predicted that the driver of a random vehicle she picked out--a silver T&C--wouldn't come forward when the van was publicized all over western Michigan.

In fact, if that's exactly what she did, the manager has to be the luckiest co-conspirator I've ever heard of since she picked a driver who has chosen to remain anonymous. What if the driver comes forward and says, "Yep, that's me. That's my van. I had my two daughters in the car. We were coming back from the movies." What then? It just about automatically shows the manager is involved. Better to keep your mouth shut and everyone think you're a fool than to open it and remove all doubt.

Having said all this, I think this is all putting the cart before the horse. The key is figuring out if the manager could see what she said she saw that night. Not WHAT she saw but if it was physically possible to do so. My belief is she exaggerated her story--seeing the van as far away as she did, etc.. But exaggeration isn't a crime. But if someone can prove she exaggerated, then the police can start to give her a harder time about the rest of the facts.

BBM....after refreshing my memory by rereading a few articles from about three months ago, I agree that LE still believes the van may be involved. According to NSPD Chief Shaw, "based on the fact the driver has not been identified and the van’s departure from the Exxon store is within the timeline of Jessica’s disappearance, investigators still believe it may be involved".
 
Someone who remembers, refresh my memory please..wasn't the manager's brother supposedly Jessica's boyfriend who wanted her to share an apartment with him. And didn't she allegedly turn him down? And didn't he allegedly visit her at the store earlier that evening??

Jessica Heeringa: A new twist revealed
The woman who provided police with their biggest clue in the Jessica Heeringa disappearance — the description that led to the sketch of a possible suspect — has a close relationship with a person later identified as a person of interest in the case, Target 8 has learned.

They are brother and sister — and the brother, his family said, had recently dated Heeringa.

he family of the key witness, who is not being named due to her connection to the investigation, said police quickly focused on the witness’ 40-year-old brother because of his relationship with Heeringa.

They said detectives searched a hunting cabin on their property, just a few blocks from the Exxon station, searched their son’s cellphone, and searched the family’s silver minivan.
His family said he has an alibi — that he was fishing when Heeringa disappeared. They said police confirmed that through phone records.

His parents said they were up north with their silver minivan on a gambling trip — and that police checked surveillance video at the casino to confirm it.

The family’s van, the father said, is similar to the van his daughter and her husband described leaving the Exxon station about the time of Heeringa’s disappearance.
 
Bringing official timeline over from the other page.

Exxon map link in case someone wants to try to map it. My grandson just woke up; I'm out of time


Here’s the timeline, released by the Norton Shores Police Department:

April 26, 2013:

2:44 p.m.: Heeringa purchased groceries at Aldi, 2715 Henry St.

4:35 p.m.: Heeringa begins her shift at the Exxon store. She was aware the store did not have video cameras, as she had advised customers of this and the fact she was working alone. She was not worried about the lack of cameras. It was not uncommon for Heeringa to prop open the rear door and turn off the store’s rear security light so she could smoke cigarettes behind the store or allow friends to enter via the rear door, according to police.
7:30 – 8:15 p.m.: A man who told police he was Heeringa's boyfriend at the time (*Not to be confused with her fiance, Dakotah Quail-Dyer) arrived at the Exxon station in a work vehicle, a silver full-size van. The two reportedly had a discussion regarding their alleged relationship.
A customer advised that Heeringa appeared to be upset after the conversation with the male subject.
7:40 – 8:50 p.m.: A female friend entered the store through the front door to visit Heeringa. Nothing suspicious was noticed at that time.
Both the female friend and a male customer observed a bluish silver van pull up to Heeringa while she was changing the receipt paper in one of the pumps. It appeared that the male driver and Heeringa were having a friendly conversation.
10:55 p.m.: A female customer entered the store and purchased a lighter. She advised that Heeringa was alone in the store and did not appear to be nervous or distressed. The customer did not see anyone in the store or in the parking lot.
11 p.m.: An Exxon manager and her husband were riding their motorcycles eastbound on Sternberg Road.
She saw a silver minivan slowly enter the north drive of the Exxon station from the service drive of the Pointes Mall.
The van drove behind the Exxon station, did a u-turn and extinguished its headlights as it pulled behind the store facing west.
The manager suspected Heeringa may be in the process of stealing from Exxon, so she turned around on Harvey Street to return to the store.
The manager and her husband drove to the Pointes Mall, west of the Exxon station, and parked in the lot with a view of the north and west sides of the Exxon station. The minivan was parked on the north side of the Exxon station.
There were no other vehicles in the lot except for Heeringa's.
The manager saw a figure standing at the rear of the van and noticed the van’s rear hatch was open. The figure shut the rear hatch and quickly opened it again. It appeared as though the figure was adjusting something in the rear of the van, and then closed the hatch again. She noted that the person's head was just above the roof of the van.
The person then walked to the driver’s door, got into the van and began driving westbound on the service drive.
The manager said the store’s rear security light was not on and the store’s rear door did not open at any time. She never saw a struggle or heard anyone yell for help. She did not see Heeringa outside of the store.
As the van drove closer to their location in the parking lot, the manager and her husband started their motorcycles and pulled up to the service drive. As the van passed, she looked at the driver, a male subject wearing a red or orange sweatshirt. Her husband stated that he did not see the subject well, but did see that he had “crazy” or wavy hair. Neither of them saw Heeringa or anyone else in the van.
The manager and her husband pulled onto the service drive and followed the van until it stopped at Grand Haven Road. The manager’s husband stated that he was positive the van was a Chrysler Town and Country van, silver in color, as it was the same type a relative owned (Note: This vehicle was located and was in Traverse City at the time of the abduction). He clearly remembered the Town and Country logo on the rear hatch door. Neither obtained the license plate number, as they had no reason to believe a crime had occurred.
The van turned northbound on Grand Haven Road, while the manager and her husband turned southbound on Grand Haven Road and went home.
11:02 p.m: Surveillance video from inside of a closed store in the Pointes Mall captured a silver minivan turning northbound onto Grand Haven Road.
11:03 p.m: Surveillance video from the Homestead Tavern captured a silver minivan driving northbound on Grand Haven Road.
11:05 p.m: Surveillance video from the Coin Zone captured a silver minivan driving northbound on Grand Haven Road.
11:10 p.m: A male customer arrived at the gas station, pulled up to the pump and attempted to purchase gasoline. He was unable to do so as the pump would not activate. When the pump did not activate, he entered the store believing that the clerk may have been in the back room and not aware of his presence at the pump. He was unable to locate Heeringa. Upon exiting the store, he spoke with a female customer and called 911.
11:15 p.m.: Patrol units are dispatched to Exxon, 1196 E Sternberg Road, Norton Shores, regarding a suspicious situation.
11:25 p.m.: The first officer arrives and begins investigation. Officers searched the store but did not locate Heeringa. Officers located Heeringa's purse and jacket in the back room. The purse contained $420 in cash. Officers noted that nothing inside the store indicated a struggle. There was nothing that appeared to be disturbed. Officers exited the rear door and noted that the door did not have a handle on the outside.
Officers located items of possible evidence outside the rear door, including what appeared to be a 2-inch by 3-inch blood stain on the concrete, later determined to be Heeringa's. Officers photographed the interior and exterior of the store and evidence items prior to collection. Officers collected a sample of the possible blood stain and packaged the other evidence items.
11.38 p.m.: Exxon owner was contacted regarding the open store. He in turn contacted the day-shift manager to respond as she lives closer to the store.
11:50 p.m.: The day-shift manager arrives at the Exxon station and provides officers with her observations of the silver minivan and its driver.
The manager advised that the cash drawer was “counted down” for the next shift, indicating Heeringa was preparing to close the store. While talking to officers, the manager observed the man claiming to be Heeringa's boyfriend drive past the store in a work vehicle. He was contacted to come to the Exxon station and was questioned by officers.
12:38 a.m.: A K-9 team requested to search area. A search of the area north and east of the store was conducted with no results.
 
Thanks, the guy that made the 911 call said that he stopped there at least 2 times a week at that same time. He said that Jessica was a "hard worker" and would be outside washing windows or cleaning up at that time of night. So if the abductor watched Jessica he knew that too. Maybe he just sat out back because he knew she would be opening that back door any moment to take that trash out and he just grabbed her as soon as she opened the door.
Also wondering about the other car he saw.. a Honda SUV? He saw one car close to the building and then the SUV. One was Jessica's, who had a car there? He said no one else was there but there were 2 cars left there, or maybe the "one out front" did have a customer.

He also said he got there at 11:07 pm. (video at link) I wondered about the other car as well. Did it arrive before him?

http://www.wzzm13.com/news/article/254799/2/Police-Jessica-Heeringa-likely-knew-abductor
 
The way I understand the Honda SUV and relate it to the timeline is the female customer in the timeline is the driver of the Honda SUV. We have to remember he didn't make the call until he came back out of the store. It's very possible the only car in the parking lot was Jessica's when he pulled in and then went inside. And then when he came out the Honda was there. Thus, when asked if there were any other cars in the parking lot, he says Jessica's and the Honda, not maybe realizing the 911 dispatcher meant "cars in the parking lot when he pulled in, not when he came out of the store".

It's important to remember that since that 911 call, the police have attempted to iron some of those facts out. Granted, you all know my attitude toward a small part of the timeline. But I suppose I could be relating the timeline to that 911 call in the wrong way.

The 911 call does bring to the forefront another fact: Not only had Jessica closed out her drawer at least a half hour early but she shut off the gas pumps as well. This was the very reason the 911 caller went inside--because he couldn't pump gas. And remember: He was eventually identified as a person who stopped at that Exxon a couple times a week. And it sounds like he was surprised the pumps weren't on.

I pretty much don't understand why she counted her drawer early--but it smells like theft to me.

But what was she doing with the gas pumps? I understand some stations do that because they're afraid of people gassing up and driving off with not paying. So, if a person wants gas and wants to pay with cash, the person must give the money to the cashier first, then the cashier turns the pump on.

However, my impression is the 911 caller was trying to use a credit card. Why? Because he said he tried to pump the gas and it wouldn't work. Well, if he's a regular customer and pays cash for gas, he should already know he needs to go inside and give his money to Jessica before the pump will work. So, there's no reason to try to pump the gas before he does that.

But he did try to pump gas before going inside. So, I'm left believing he was trying to use his credit card and the pump wouldn't turn on.

Why were the pumps turned off? It almost seems like Jessica was trying to drive customers away, i.e. no cash for change, pumps not working.

Overall, given the cash drawer and the pumps, it gives me the impression of one of two things: 1. She was trying to get out of work earlier than 11:30pm, and she was trying to do that by making the store seem as closed as possible. OR 2. She thought somebody was coming by and she didn't want to allow her work to get in the way of the meeting, so she was trying to make it impossible for customers to do business.

Does anybody have any insight to this? Especially the gas pump issue.
 
One more thing . . .

Since the 911 caller was a regular at the Exxon it's safe to assume he got gas there at about the same time--generally after work, a little after 11pm. And from the 911 call I'm left with the idea he was surprised the pumps weren't on. Meaning: He was used to them being on when he stopped at that Exxon at that time of night.

However, they weren't on a little after 11pm when he stopped the night Jessica disappeared. Coincidence? Something? Nothing?

I'd like to know if the 911 caller ever experienced the pumps being off before and had to go inside to get the clerk--possibly Jessica--to turn them on. Were the pumps being off a little after 11pm a common occurrence? Or was it standard practice? Given that he stopped at the Exxon that night and professed to being a regular customer tells me he was happy with the service there. Thus, the pumps were usually on when he stopped at that time of night.

Maybe somebody else has a different impression.
 
Was that jessica's regular shift or was she filling in for someone? Each person does things differently.
 
One more thing . . .

Since the 911 caller was a regular at the Exxon it's safe to assume he got gas there at about the same time--generally after work, a little after 11pm. And from the 911 call I'm left with the idea he was surprised the pumps weren't on. Meaning: He was used to them being on when he stopped at that Exxon at that time of night.

However, they weren't on a little after 11pm when he stopped the night Jessica disappeared. Coincidence? Something? Nothing?

I'd like to know if the 911 caller ever experienced the pumps being off before and had to go inside to get the clerk--possibly Jessica--to turn them on. Were the pumps being off a little after 11pm a common occurrence? Or was it standard practice? Given that he stopped at the Exxon that night and professed to being a regular customer tells me he was happy with the service there. Thus, the pumps were usually on when he stopped at that time of night.

Maybe somebody else has a different impression.

Listened to it (911 call) again. He does say he tried to start the gas; pump wouldn't turn on. I'm in a no self serve state; so am not sure how SS works; but I assume she would flip the pump on when she saw someone pull up. Would be a safety measure so that someone doesn't fill their car & take off
 
Roselvr, I've listened to the tape. That's exactly why I went through the logical progression above regarding the 911 caller's behavior.

To answer your question about self-serve gas, if a person has a credit card, sliding the card and punching in the correct info is what turns the pump on. That didn't happen on the night Jessica disappeared. Why?

This is a question because the 911 caller--a regular customer--expected the pump to work after he inputted his info. But it didn't. This was a surprise to him. And I find it hard to believe that every time he pulled up to the pumps at that Exxon that the clerk quickly "unlocked" the pumps before he used them. I guess it's possible . . . I suppose.

Having worked at convenience stores a long time ago, what it tells me is she had shut the pumps off as if she were closing for the night. Just like she had counted out her drawer. Once again, it all seems odd.
 
Roselvr, I've listened to the tape. That's exactly why I went through the logical progression above regarding the 911 caller's behavior.

To answer your question about self-serve gas, if a person has a credit card, sliding the card and punching in the correct info is what turns the pump on. That didn't happen on the night Jessica disappeared. Why?

This is a question because the 911 caller--a regular customer--expected the pump to work after he inputted his info. But it didn't. This was a surprise to him. And I find it hard to believe that every time he pulled up to the pumps at that Exxon that the clerk quickly "unlocked" the pumps before he used them. I guess it's possible . . . I suppose.

Having worked at convenience stores a long time ago, what it tells me is she had shut the pumps off as if she were closing for the night. Just like she had counted out her drawer. Once again, it all seems odd.

Good question why the pumps were turned off.
A WS member went to Exxon; did a quick diagram of how the store is laid out. I went to grab it; will attach it below; hope she doesn't mind me posting it
I wonder if perhaps she turned them off to use the bathroom which is located to the left of the back door.

06-18-2013, 08:55 AM Tangie
Last weekend, I wanted to do a little sleuthing so my husband and I took a ride over to Norton Shores and stopped at the Exxon. First thing I saw was a bunch of red spray paint on the ground in the back of the store sloppily applied to a gas cover. Talk about heart-stopping.

Anyway, the store was fairly deserted in the middle of the afternoon. Only two other people there besides us. Looks like it is being boycotted. They did have the Missing poster taped on the front door and the suspect sketch is taped to the checkout counter. A big, strong-looking man was working. The store is clean and tidy, but seems a little run-down at the edges. Some of the shelves seemed a little empty. There was a big wooden stick sitting near the back door. To prop the door open or for self-defense? Not sure (that was always my family's weapon of choice) Oh, and there were shiny new security cameras in the corners!

There are large glass windows across the front and side of the store. A clerk would be able see cars coming from a long distance away. (maybe Jessica felt comfortable to sneak outside for a quick smoke or to run the trash out?) On the other hand, anyone outside would have a great view of the interior at night. But the back side of the store - that's another story. Totally isolated, probably very dark and spooky at night. The dumpster is closer to the car wash next door, probably 150 feet away. I would not want to be the person taking the trash out at night, that's for sure.

Then we followed the path the van took that night. It runs right next to an airport, and it's also somewhat isolated, lots of open space on one side. We both had the impression that this guy is local and was comfortable/familiar with this road. I would think you'd want to get back on the highway and merge with other traffic as soon as possible. There are little dark wooded nooks and crannies behind the airport and a cemetery. In fact, there are little dead ends and wooded areas throughout this area.

Checked out the Ross Park parking lot. We doubted anything happened here - it has a rather large parking lot, and April 26 was one of the first warm-ish days we've had here - there would have been a chance of people being here, kids parking, police patrols, etc.

I cannot help but think of some of the RSOs people were sleuthing earlier. They live just a few minutes down the road. But I also can't imagine doing this in your own backyard! I wonder if the police have a few strong suspects, but just can't pin anything on them?
 

Attachments

  • ExxonLayout.jpg
    ExxonLayout.jpg
    53.5 KB · Views: 341
Thanks to all for keeping this going forward. I would hope some group would actively look for Jessica in parks ,fields , and roadsides gradually expanding outward from where she disappeared. stacy petersons sister now has a cadaver dog. It has been almost 7 years. She will never give up looking for her sister.
 
Just my 2 cents regarding the pumps. Where I am it is not unusual that even cash payers will go to the pump, try to start pumping but the machines are off and won't pump, the attendant (presumably after making note of the vehicle) will turn the pump on and announce over the speaker "Pump 2, you're ready to pump. We'll see you inside." or something along those lines. If he, in fact, was using a credit card, I don't have an answer. But that is a logical and innocent explanation to me. Where I'm at, only the high crime areas make all cash payers pay before pumping but NONE allow you to just begin pumping without being activated from inside after they realize you're there. In fact, thinking about it, once they lift up on the handle or whatever it rings bells inside to alert the attendant that they have a customer. Thing drives me crazy when I'm inside buying gas. It stops ringing once they activate the pump and tell the customer to please pay inside when they're done.
 
Some stations around here have some pumps ( usually ones not directly in the attendants line of sight ) that are always pay before you pump, and others that you can pay after you pump the gas - but yes they need to be activated by the attendant. So perhaps the 911 caller was used to lifting the pump, and Jessica activating it right away. So if he stood there a few and she did not activate it, he probably went in thinking she may be stocking the coolers etc. I personally would not find it ominous - probably just annoying. ( actually, being me, I would have just said " to heck with it!" and left if I were not desperate for gas...) My daughter ( who worked at a gas station for several years..) says in her station if there were people she knew well, and trusted, they would activate the pump and let them pay afterwards. But usually this was frowned on since if that person took off, and the cashier had activated the pump without them pre-paying, the attendant would be responsible for covering the drive off. SO- if the Exxon station worked like that, the 911 caller would have to be someone she knew well enough to trust them to pay. Considering it was late at night, I assume the pumps were all technically 'pay first'
 
Some stations around here have some pumps ( usually ones not directly in the attendants line of sight ) that are always pay before you pump, and others that you can pay after you pump the gas - but yes they need to be activated by the attendant. So perhaps the 911 caller was used to lifting the pump, and Jessica activating it right away. So if he stood there a few and she did not activate it, he probably went in thinking she may be stocking the coolers etc. I personally would not find it ominous - probably just annoying. ( actually, being me, I would have just said " to heck with it!" and left if I were not desperate for gas...) My daughter ( who worked at a gas station for several years..) says in her station if there were people she knew well, and trusted, they would activate the pump and let them pay afterwards. But usually this was frowned on since if that person took off, and the cashier had activated the pump without them pre-paying, the attendant would be responsible for covering the drive off. SO- if the Exxon station worked like that, the 911 caller would have to be someone she knew well enough to trust them to pay. Considering it was late at night, I assume the pumps were all technically 'pay first'

Were you local? Can't recall...
Gonna send my local friend a text to see if she has gassed up there
 
Some stations around here have some pumps ( usually ones not directly in the attendants line of sight ) that are always pay before you pump, and others that you can pay after you pump the gas - but yes they need to be activated by the attendant. So perhaps the 911 caller was used to lifting the pump, and Jessica activating it right away. So if he stood there a few and she did not activate it, he probably went in thinking she may be stocking the coolers etc. I personally would not find it ominous - probably just annoying. ( actually, being me, I would have just said " to heck with it!" and left if I were not desperate for gas...) My daughter ( who worked at a gas station for several years..) says in her station if there were people she knew well, and trusted, they would activate the pump and let them pay afterwards. But usually this was frowned on since if that person took off, and the cashier had activated the pump without them pre-paying, the attendant would be responsible for covering the drive off. SO- if the Exxon station worked like that, the 911 caller would have to be someone she knew well enough to trust them to pay. Considering it was late at night, I assume the pumps were all technically 'pay first'

Were you local? Can't recall...
I sent my local friend a text to see if she has gassed up there; she actually has! She used to go to her Exxon once a week. She thinks after a certain time at night, they made the pumps pre-pay.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
172
Guests online
4,328
Total visitors
4,500

Forum statistics

Threads
592,443
Messages
17,969,023
Members
228,773
Latest member
OccasionalMallard
Back
Top