If she is dead while a reputable force like Scotland Yard is still looking for her?
Do you think they are only investigating because they think she is alive? I think they'd investigate her disappearance even if they didn't think so. That she might be alive would, of course, be the best case scenario, among a bunch of bad ones. I'm afraid that I don't think she is either-it would be great to find out that somebody stole her so they could raise her in a nice family home, etc, etc. I hope SY can get to the bottom of this, but I am not holding my breath.
Was that before or after they looked at cadaver dog evidence??Only recently SY said there was a big possibility she might be alive.
Only recently SY said there was a big possibility she might be alive.
Only recently SY said there was a big possibility she might be alive.
Was that before or after they looked at cadaver dog evidence??
No, that was only few months ago that SY said this.
The cadaver dog evidence was discounted long before this.
Scotland Yard has looked at everything and is still persuading their leads.
Looking at the parents is the first thing the UK police does, they passed that level long ago !
No, that was only few months ago that SY said this.
The cadaver dog evidence was discounted long before this.
Scotland Yard has looked at everything and is still persuading their leads.
Looking at the parents is the first thing the UK police does, they passed that level long ago !
I think it is their responsibilty to treat this disappearance as if she is still alive-I am having a really difficult time imagining her as a sex slave in some ring of pedophiles, though-it makes me sick that I just typed that. I don't have high hopes that they will solve the case. It's difficult enough in your own country, but because another county's laws come into play, it makes it more complicated. Plus, it seems that the Portuguese are focused on the McCanns as culprit, while in England it seems that people are more likely to blame an unknown abductor-making cooperation a little questionable.
Only recently SY said there was a big possibility she might be alive.
The cops often say that-who knows what they really think. They have an obligation to investigate
I am always open to finding something new or looking at data from a different way. I also consider evidence proved or discredited, and not only what happened at the time, but the results of all of that during the last six years. That's called being open minded.It always amazes me when someone argues their POV passionately and persistently then turns around and says "well I better read the facts". :scared:
Isn't that part of sleuthing? Folks cant read everything but the basic skeleton of fact/inaccuracies remains the same, and were available to everyone to read.
Nothing was new on Crimewatch. The only thing that was new was the McCanns story has been illustrated as LIES....oops sorry they were "mistaken".
:banghead:
When was the cadaver dog evidence discounted, link please.
Madeleine DNA samples too degraded for proper analysis<?xml:namespace prefix = "o" ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" /><o></o>
http://news.monstersandcritics.com/uk/news/article_1378439.php/McCanns_Madeleine_DNA_samples_too_degraded_for_proper_analysis_-_police <o></o>
<o> </o>
McCann DNA evidence 'exaggerated'<o></o>
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/7541810.stm
<o></o>
<o> </o>
IMO the Portuguese got it right.
SY has found nothing new. IMO nothing noteworthy. Nothing earth shattering and certainly nothing's been produced to eliminate the McCann's as viable suspects.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk - now Free