BIB
Hey Shane
That's exactly what I'm trying to say for a few days ! Why the affidavit is so absurd is because it is designed to reinforce an undefinable intruder with
' a noise in the toilet ' and at the same time cover RS's struggling in the house IMO ..
I also wonder when he phoned the brother /lawyer ? He doesn't mention that in his affidavit. But we so far know that no calls were made from the phones that the police could take that day.. So, if he called them after EM and the neighbor arrived, they would see him calling brother/lawyer possibily. Perhaps
he made second calls to them pretending that was the first call.
IMO he made those calls before he called the EM anyway..
I wonder if was that the reason that phone was not given to the police when asked .Can that be forgotten ? the only phone used.. But strangely
other/no call phone of OP were put in the crime scene .. and was given to the police.. ?????????????????????
Can those calls be deleted ? Can clean phone calls report be given ?
That wouldn't surprise me at all.
What bothers me is the intent and attempt to hide things? JMO
Exactly,why not hand over the most important of all his phones to the police, the only one withheld is the one he used that night. IMO the reason being is that he had something to cover up and both he and the defence needed this record of his calls to help them devise his affidavit before police got their hands on it. It is also very suspicious and underhand for a defence team to withhold evidence from the police authorities.