State v. Bradley Cooper - 3-15-2011 (after Lunch) - 3.?

New Posts

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm gonna assume the bear painting we saw in the photo of their dining room was THE bear painting we've heard so much about. Not speaking to how much it costs or how she obtained it, but I can see why she loved it so much. I was very taken with it. Does anyone know the artists name? TIA!
 
Carrie Clark is gorgeous. Wonder why BC avoided all contact with her when she first came up. Shame?
 
lib's mom said:
I'm gonna assume the bear painting we saw in the photo of their dining room was THE bear painting we've heard so much about. Not speaking to how much it costs or how she obtained it, but I can see why she loved it so much. I was very taken with it. Does anyone know the artists name? TIA!
Click to expand...

I don't recall the name. I think it is in the depositions, perhaps the video depositions due to the cost.
 
The state is asking CC all these questions about running locations, plans, distances and times.

I think they are not only proving that NC had no plans to run with CC on Saturday, but are clearly showing that she should not have been gone as long as she was, yet BC did not seem overly concerned, until JA called - Again. Then he was all, "No, I am going to go look for her" At this point it has not been shown that she ever ran in the area she was found.
 
I heard some talk of her normal running attire. Has she said anything about what shoes Nancy normally wore?

My video feed got hung up and I had to restart it. Thanks in advance!
 
CyberPro said:
The state is asking CC all these questions about running locations, plans, distances and times.

I think they are not only proving that NC had no plans to run with CC on Saturday, but are clearly showing that she should not have been gone as long as she was, yet BC did not seem overly concerned, until JA called - Again. Then he was all, "No, I am going to go look for her" At this point it has not been shown that she ever ran in the area she was found.
Click to expand...

To me, this is the first very damaging testimony for BC. Seems like the most they were ever out together was a couple hours. And NC always drove her car to the coffee shop when running (which explains why she would sometimes stop for coffee during/after).
 
Also, if NC was going to meet a "date" for her running mate, she would not have left on foot. She would have driven.
 
NC wore white shoes with blue and silver trim. ASICS
 
Pretty interesting that she said Nancy never runs alone outside.

Provides strong testimony for the prosecution, but also an opening for the defense. The defense in cross will get her to say Nancy would never run alone because it was not safe. There are crazies (and guys in white vans with their lights off) out there.
 
CyberPro said:
The state is asking CC all these questions about running locations, plans, distances and times.

I think they are not only proving that NC had no plans to run with CC on Saturday, but are clearly showing that she should not have been gone as long as she was, yet BC did not seem overly concerned, until JA called - Again. Then he was all, "No, I am going to go look for her" At this point it has not been shown that she ever ran in the area she was found.
Click to expand...

I don't think the defense will claim she ran on Fielding Drive. You'd have a death wish to ever run on Holly Springs Rd (no pun intended give this is a murder trial).
 
BrownRice said:
My computer feed keeps dying and going to weather. Urgh.. When did Saucony's come up? she specifically said Asics earlier.
Click to expand...

When she identified shoes similar to those Nancy wore when they ran together, those shoes were Sauconys.

She seems very credible to me, so I think she was simply mistaken about the brand name being Asics.
 
RoughlyCollie said:
When she identified shoes similar to those Nancy wore when they ran together, those shoes were Sauconys.

She seems very credible to me, so I think she was simply mistaken about the brand name being Asics.
Click to expand...

I agree that she was probably just confused about the brand name.
 
calgary123 said:
Pretty interesting that she said Nancy never runs alone outside.

Provides strong testimony for the prosecution, but also an opening for the defense. The defense in cross will get her to say Nancy would never run alone because it was not safe. There are crazies (and guys in white vans with their lights off) out there.
Click to expand...

Add in that she also testified that Nancy and her met at Java Jive, not from the home and Nancy drove there - Nancy always had her keys with her when running as well. Interesting stuff.
 
Carey Clark CONFIRMED that Nancy told her that she planned to paint at JA's house SAT MORNING (and thus could not run with her on Sat). They were supposed to run on Fri 7/11, but Nancy canceled, telling Carey that her legs were tired.

This totally refutes the defense assertion that JA was 'making up' these painting plans!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

DNASolves

Who is Escambia County John Doe (1989)?

Members online

... and 205 more.
Total: 4,516 (members: 206, guests: 4,310)

Online statistics

Members online
206
Guests online
4,310
Total visitors
4,516
Totals may include hidden visitors.

Forum statistics

Threads
592,469
Messages
17,969,375
Members
228,777
Latest member
Jojo53
Back
Top