If AC got out of school at 3:42....walked home...prob arrived there around 4:10- 4:15.....had a snack, something to drink....maybe even a bit po'd because Somer has done this so often....went back out to search around 4:30....prob arrived at the park to search about 4:50....DT left work at 4:20.....30 min drive....gets AC from park and flags down LE at 5:00....there is not much time there to be searching anywhere....MO and why would AC pick the park to search at in the first place? or did he?
Good Morning. The timeline AS TOLD, does give one pause don't it?
Somebody mentioned that first Monday interview which I haven't found a Firstcoastnews version of, but it seems the Sheriff says they searched like an hour and a half before flagging down. When according to the MPR they could have only been there about 10 or 15 minutes in that area. I wondered if the time on the MPR was started when the detective arrived even later, or was this started by Det. Coan. We don't know when DT left work. We only know when she said she left. We don't know when AC did anything because he is not mentioned in the MPR except as someone being picked up at the park, no particular stated time. And as I mentioned a couple days ago, how could he be "picked up" and "still down there looking"
Though he wasn't asked to give a statement at the time, he did talk with LE later that night in an informal setting. Walking around, I told him what WE........
Now, that to me is an unconscious word choice. It indicates to me a discussion of what occured. Since all timelines are given by one person with the exception of SP saying what time the kids arrived, it is DT who lays them out. She text him first at 4PM (she says) from where we don't know as her job has not confirmed what time she left, he text or calls back with THE NEWS. She says then 20 minutes after first call she texts CP (whom we don't know where he was) but, SP and presumably CP also agree he arrived at a few minutes after 5. Has there ever been a shorter timeline for a crime to take place, in broad daylight with LE and people all around? Despite the fact the MPR says last secured at 3:10 for some reason, we can presume she was last seen by either K., or her friend from school before then. Both seem to cover about the same time perid. But, in truth we don't know if either is accurate.
Surprise! One because it was given by a young minor who may or not have the same memory as other children who place her somewhere else (last seen running west on Gano past the Debarry turnoff). And K., who called NOT LE with his story, but contacted a reporter first instead. If he dad talked to LE first, he probably would have been instructed to NOT talk to the media, I would think. Just my rethinking before I go to work today.
