From my link above:
"....[Killer, Evan] Marshall, who is bipolar and has a history of mental illness and drug and alcohol abuse, dismembered Fox at his mother's house nearby. Fox's head was later discovered by cops in a car Marshall was driving..."
and
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_..._term_for_denice_fox_kille.html#ixzz1B9erKglq
"....[Judge] LaPera said he believed a first-degree murder conviction, if obtained at trial, would not withstand appeal. Noting that prosecutors hid from [Denice] Fox's family details of the grisly killing - which detectives have termed a psychosexual murder - LaPera reasoned Fox's "dignity" is best "preserved" by preventing the specifics from being made public at trial...."
I'm not sure how I feel about details being withheld from the family. I didn't even know that could be done. I surely understand the reason for wanting to protect the family but at what cost? Only 27 years for a murder like this? He got five years for the hit and run.
And there's a term, "psychosexual", that I had not read before. It strikes me as similar to the murders we've seen where the body is ritualistically dismembered and/or staged. Any possibility that this could be the case with Ms. Gleave?
If the homeless man living in the barn is the killer, they've got him and the community can relax. But if this is the act of a neighbor or someone close to Ms. Gleave, the community has every reason to be terrified.
"....[Killer, Evan] Marshall, who is bipolar and has a history of mental illness and drug and alcohol abuse, dismembered Fox at his mother's house nearby. Fox's head was later discovered by cops in a car Marshall was driving..."
and
Read more: http://www.nydailynews.com/news/ny_..._term_for_denice_fox_kille.html#ixzz1B9erKglq
"....[Judge] LaPera said he believed a first-degree murder conviction, if obtained at trial, would not withstand appeal. Noting that prosecutors hid from [Denice] Fox's family details of the grisly killing - which detectives have termed a psychosexual murder - LaPera reasoned Fox's "dignity" is best "preserved" by preventing the specifics from being made public at trial...."
I'm not sure how I feel about details being withheld from the family. I didn't even know that could be done. I surely understand the reason for wanting to protect the family but at what cost? Only 27 years for a murder like this? He got five years for the hit and run.
And there's a term, "psychosexual", that I had not read before. It strikes me as similar to the murders we've seen where the body is ritualistically dismembered and/or staged. Any possibility that this could be the case with Ms. Gleave?
If the homeless man living in the barn is the killer, they've got him and the community can relax. But if this is the act of a neighbor or someone close to Ms. Gleave, the community has every reason to be terrified.