juicedog23
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2008
- Messages
- 58
- Reaction score
- 0
I will pretend like I am a TH does this sound like one of them?
If I were a juror, and all I knew about this case was what has been presented in evidence:
I would think KC is a liar, and not a model citizen, and was very upset about being in jail. (if I was innocent and in jail, I would be very upset as well). I would wonder why the state brought in so many witnesses to prove she was a liar. That was pretty obvious after the first two or three, and one jailhouse tape would have confirmed that. All that repetition seemed redundant. It also drove home the point that all these witnesses believed she was a good mother, and had a great relationship with her daughter.
Her father did not seem sincere on the stand, and he didn't get upset when accused of molestion and looked guilty when he answered. Then later he got very agitated about gas cans????
The trunk of the Pontiac smells really bad, like somebody died in there.
The hair with apparent decomp, may have come from a living person, or from a dead person according to the FBI expert. Hair with apparent decomp has never been used in a trial before.
The white trash bag sat in a dumpster for hours before it became part of the chain of evidence, and some of the evidence from this white trash bag may have been inadvertantly altered. The expert who put the trash in the drying room seemed very nervous after seeing the photo of the wet trash.
The collection of samples provided to the air sample expert were not collected by the expert, and the shockingly high level of chloroform doesn't make sense because the FBI expert said it wasn't a shockingly high level of chloroform. Air samples have never been used in a trial before. This expert thought he read his initials on an evidence can, but he was mistaken, wonder what else he has misread or been mistaken about.
The two dogs have never alerted without a find anytime they were in a real world scenario, ever in their entire careers, until this case. (Anthony backyard) (trunk)
84 times? HUH? recess till tomorrow morning
Now I know these are all little things, but when you take the totality of all of these points well then circumstantially you find yourself with reasonable doubt.
Did I do good huh? Does this sound like one of the TH's?
This is the most POWERFULL "circumstantial" case I've ever seen! And I'm not sure why some people, talking heads included, keep hammering on the topic this is soley a circumstantial case. I know, thus far, some may feel the forensic evidence has been weak. But also keep in mind we haven't even gotten to the evidence found at the remain site...duct tape, winnie the pooh blanket, trash bags, ect.
Now, factor the biggest mistake made was by the defense in this trial by making such an unbelieveable and "ELABORATE" "story" of what actually happened. Caylee accidently drowns, GA hides the body instead of calling 911, Roy Kronk somehow gets ahold of the remains, has a tea party with 'em for awhile or something until he finally places them near hopespring to cash in his lottery ticket. The jurors heard this "story" and it doesn't matter if they can't use it as evidence...they still heard it and it's in there mind. If I'm a juror and have now gone through and listened to how for years ICA has lied, not only lied, but is one of the greatest liars I've ever seen who can create a bizzare imaginary world and have dozens of family and friends completely "FOOLED".
So...I expect on the prosecution's closing arguments they will go through each and every aspect of this mountain of "circumstantial" evidence...and at the end I expect them to say her "DETAILED" lies and "ELABORATE" imaginary stories have fooled her family and friends for "YEARS". Don't let them fool you too! Cased Closed!