You did not read this anywhere else (unless someone copied and pasted my post), and I don't do post for pay internet. These are my own thoughts and opinions.
The point I made is that while you may consider that there was compelling evidence which left no choice but to vote G - in reality there was not.
Depending on who was testifying: there was an odor or there was not, there was "shockingly high" chloroform levels or there was insignificant levels.
You can choose to disregard testimony and evidence which does not agree with the State's assertion that Casey chloroformed Caylee and duct taped her mouth and nose (NOTE: this has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt or nothing else matters according to the LAW, not anyone's personal standards) but that doesn't mean the jurors should ignore it...in fact they are bound to consider and give weight/credence to it.
I would like a better explanation of how duct tape can be considered "innocently" placed upon anyone's face, adult, animal or child? Not to ignore the fact that even if one accepts that the duct tape was not to be ignored, i.e. it had something to do with the death of the victim Caylee-how can one lead to a conclusion that it wasn't some form of homicide or even at the lowest threshold manslaughter occurring since not only was the body found posthumously skeletonized, but also it was hidden for over 6 months from said accident in a trash dump/swamp (a location known to Casey-not brother Lee, Cynthia, or George). Bodies just don't wrap themselves up and hide themselves for months to decompose-but murderers who want all forms of evidence such as DNA or fingerprints to degrade do hide the truth. I have yet to see a murderer perform such a vile act and then go and report the truth. Please enlighten me.
Now the naysayers will say that doesn't prove murder or that Casey was the perpetrator; however, I would disagree because regardless of what she (Casey) said at that time of June 16-July 16 and onward into the investigation, this MOTHER knew of something regardless of an accident, murder, kidnapping etc...yet she chose to mislead and throw an investigation in one direction solely for the intent to allow time for "conditions of the body" to change. She obviously didn't lie to point them in the direction as to implicate herself did she?
As much as people believe Casey was dumb I feel she was not - she had some knowledge of how time frames to allow for decomposition to occur, whether it was acquired from LE friends or some other source...i.e being a daughter of a previous LE homicide investigator, somehow as much as this has been blown out of proportion-I can not find any other conclusion than the MOTHER whom was the sole custodian parent of the victim Caylee had the utmost responsibility to report on what she truthfully knew-she chose not to do so because she knew the truth and she knew the truth would point to herself and herself only-an all out sole implication she had done this crime.
It is true lying is not enough and should not convict someone, however, it is more important to remember that it is the purposeful intent of her lies that beyond the exclusion of reasonable doubt says that no one but only Casey Marie Anthony is responsible for the death of her child.
I believe the acts of this 12 panel jury was an egregious mistake of the judicial system and unfortunately the laws now protect the culpable and not the victim. Although, many TH are saying don't blame the jury-blame the prosecution. I disagree. The blame should be to the responsible party in this matter and that is Casey Anthony. The most disgusting outcome of a criminal trial in many years.