BBM- AND if anyone did question him, he could say, I already talked to LE, I told them when I was there and what I was wearing so it must not be significant or they would call me back in.Exactly, agree. It was probably digitally washed and cleaned up very much and in that process it is not a true representation but does give the general cadence and character of the voice.
With the video AND the audio... unless that was just not heard by the right people, hard to believe it was not recognized.
I'll bet his wife or someone questioned him on it and he laughed it off and they believed him.
The man (Jesse Matthew) who murdered both Hannah Graham and Morgan Harrington, was asked by fellow coworkers of his resemblance to the suspect's sketch. He laughed it off but then grew out dreadlocks. That sketch was DEAD ON RINGER for him.
Maybe at trial we will find out if his wife or anyone else close to him did call him in or if they suspected him and questioned him at all after seeing the video or photo. There is just so much we do not know in this case yet. I don't think the defense is going to be discussing anything incriminating for their client prior to the trial. They want to expose any weaknesses in the public eye BEFORE the jury selection. I don't agree with how they have done some things, but they sure have done the job of exposing any missteps of LE. That does not mean RA was not called in and/or questioned by those close to him at some point from Feb 2017 and his arrest. I hope we hear more at trial on this because I understand denial can be a strong defense mechanism, but I'd like to believe that someone recognized him or at least had a suspicion based on his walk, his voice, his attire, and him placing himself there that day. Libby was so brave to record him and if she can be that brave, I sure hope someone that knew him was brave enough to voice their suspicions.