Yes but I think what the poster may have meant was the people he lived near, worked with or he saw socially (Like the one man from the pool bar) would probably not want to say too much before trial?
My problem with this whole argument is that JG did not in fact remove AB&BR. The withdrew informally in chamber then did a take back later. It was very shady. All around. Perhaps they should have fought harder for a formal dq.
I agree. I'm wondering just what JG's attorney meant by...from FrostedGlass's post "Rozzi and Baldwin were very experienced and highly competent...in other contexts". Is she (JG) saying they're not suited attorneys for a murder one defendant?
But it is...winning.
This seems quite likely. Even in the course of the trial, my guess is we might get some of that.
Totally agreed. The D never thought the gag order was "necessary." I'll say, they've already been trying the case with YouTube to the extent possible since they can control the flow of information. It came back on them, though, since their own client also doesn't seem to understand he needs to keep his mouth shut. When this client ends up in prison, with his D team writing books, we'll see how much RA likes them then. I hate to be so harsh, but the D's obligation was to their client and keeping him out of prison since they firmly believe he's innocent, according to themselves. During that trial, we should be seeing and hearing all kinds of information from the D that makes us feel like oh, yeah, not RA-- but there's no way I think we'll hear it. Every time I hear one of these lawyers proclaiming RA's innocence, I always think, ok... and that's because... why? And I have yet to get any kind of substantive answer from all their motions, mostly to suppress and blame crazed Odinites. The closest the D ever came for me was with the three phones at the CS, and I still believe the P will emerge victorious on that one, and that the D didn't interpret the cellular data correctly, probably because they were in the midst of their flurry of motions to suppress and quasi-investigation into an Odinite plot with tentacles into the LE, penal, and judicial systems. D's obligation shouldn't have been their YouTube audience and their future careers as novelists, which they seem to have already been prepping for with the Franks memo. MOO, they're a disaster.
Yes.
Yeah, except the Indiana Supreme Court didn't see it that way. "Structural Error"
Totally disagree with this. In my opinion it was a situation completely created by them. I believe they were dishonest with JG and it's very well put by Cyber sleuth that they "used her grace against her". JG should have aired it all out in open court that very day. AJMO
I think they'll make an exception for an accused double homicide child killer and torturer.
We'll see.
Hopefully at the upcoming hearing Judge Gull will spell it out to D like they are 5 yo on what can or cannot be alluded to based on proof or relevancy during trial. As we have learned though, this D has a hard time following the Court's rules.
They could not transport RA though. They didn't want him, said they would take him if ordered to do so, but that they did not have the ability to transport RA.
