2Goldfish's comment came right after mine. I explained how Kent's letter was used to prejudice the case against Mechele, and 2Goldfish took that as an attack on Kent. Whether 2Goldfish likes it or not, Kent's letter was in spite for Mechele not marrying him. Also, if 2Goldfish was writing about Mechele's avoiding Kent while she was on trips to see Scott, the March 31, 1996 email doesn't change the fact that Mechele really was avoiding Kent on those trips.
Quote:
Turtlepace 01-13-2012 11:53 AM
________________________________________
The prejudice started with Kent's letter.
Kent's letter has been called a letter from the grave, but Kent wrote it two days before he died. It is not a death bed statement. It is not an artifact of the murder scene. It is not an eye-witness account. The accusation that Mechele and her friends were "probably" the persons who killed him, is just the last of smears against Mechele because she did not marry him. Kent gave no reasons for his accusation.
Kent accused Mechele of having a false passport and a false driver's license because these were tools she used for avoiding him while she was seeing Scott.
Kent accused Mechele of not declaring the interest of her mortgage on her income tax. This is not illegal. How does this prove she was conspiring to murder him?
Kent accused Mechele of using John's health insurance. This is a serious accusation, but there is no report of the health insurance following up on it. How does this prove Mechele was conspiring to murder Kent?
Kent accused Mechele of being on Scott's insurance. He doesn't say what kind of insurance, but since he had specified John's health insurance, Kent probably means Scott's automobile insurance. It is not illegal to have other people on your automobile insurance. In fact since Mechele was probably using Scott's car while she was visiting him, the insurance company would probably require it. How does this prove Mechele conspired to murder Kent?
Kent accused Mechele of fraud taking money from him under the impression they were getting married. I think it would have been hard for him to win that even if he had lived to sue her. How does that prove that Mechele conspired to murder him?
The main point of Kent's spite letter was that he would have destroyed the letter if Mechele had married him. The rest including the vague accusation of murder were just smears.
www.othercircumstances.blogspot.com
Snipped
Quote:
2goldfish 01-13-2012 02:46 PM
________________________________________
I dont really like a defense of a person that primarily rests on blaming the victim
Snipped