Just Jayla
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Apr 19, 2009
- Messages
- 3,222
- Reaction score
- 211
The use of literary references is common when one is offering their philosophy-That was the theme of the hearing Tuesday, the philosophical beliefs that the defense holds, and impressing those beliefs on Judge Perry for him to transform to law.
Andrea Lyon said at one point that she would depart from her political views and argue a constructionist point of view. This reveals to me that much of what Andrea does in her framework is based not on strict adherence to law and precedent, rather she approaches the law as if it were a fluid thing that can be changed based on one's (or a group's) philosophy. Anchoring her ideas to the literary works and the expert opinions of educated minds (Ms. Rapaport) is a pseudo-foundation, because there may not be a real foundation in the law.
For Jose's part, he did no justice to the point of Harper Lee's novel-I could also note that he did not aim for the stars, choosing a college level, dripping-with-intellect book, he chose one that is read by 6th and 7th graders-But the book has its merits notwithstanding JB's bad take on the moral of the story.
If I were to give it my best shot at understanding JB's take, then KC would be the mockingbird, right? KC took in the life and the cirumstances around herself, she gave back to society and her family what she saw in it, and it is unfair to wrongly accuse her just because she is a victim of her (sexist) surroundings? Casey Anthony-A victim of circumstance. Okay...
Andrea Lyon said at one point that she would depart from her political views and argue a constructionist point of view. This reveals to me that much of what Andrea does in her framework is based not on strict adherence to law and precedent, rather she approaches the law as if it were a fluid thing that can be changed based on one's (or a group's) philosophy. Anchoring her ideas to the literary works and the expert opinions of educated minds (Ms. Rapaport) is a pseudo-foundation, because there may not be a real foundation in the law.
For Jose's part, he did no justice to the point of Harper Lee's novel-I could also note that he did not aim for the stars, choosing a college level, dripping-with-intellect book, he chose one that is read by 6th and 7th graders-But the book has its merits notwithstanding JB's bad take on the moral of the story.
If I were to give it my best shot at understanding JB's take, then KC would be the mockingbird, right? KC took in the life and the cirumstances around herself, she gave back to society and her family what she saw in it, and it is unfair to wrongly accuse her just because she is a victim of her (sexist) surroundings? Casey Anthony-A victim of circumstance. Okay...