Originally Posted by andreww View Post
His expenses were paid right? His salary was presumably paid as well. Sounds like a nice week away from working.
<modsnip> For a guy with basic labourer skills, no education, no money and a language issue, Millard actually set him up quite nicely didn't he?
Some of 'those guys' are invaluable to their employers, even if they might not happen to be 'schooled', have an accent, and usually *those* guys have much more than basic labourer skills. I know some myself who work for successful homebuilders and/or renovating companies. They are skilled in a number of areas, they manage crews of workers, organize and stay on top of outside contracted tradesmen, advise what needs to be ordered, are on top of timelines, permitting, and etc. In return, they get paid quite handsomely, on top of being supplied with a company vehicle that they take home each night, which is fuelled by a company credit card.. all of that on top of the regular benefits of being an 'employee' which include being paid for statutory holidays, getting some weeks of paid vacation time, contributions towards CPP, the ability to collect EI in the event of illness or something, coverage in case of accident and injury on the jobsite (via WSIB).. some are even included on their company's group benefit plans to cover prescriptions, dental, etc.
The ones that I know work d@mned hard, and they are respected and valued. It *sounds* like that was what Mr. V was offering to DM, but DM *seemed* to be taking advantage of a person who perhaps isn't well versed in the employment laws of our land.
I get it, what DM was trying to do.. and perhaps if Mr. V's remuneration was MUCH higher, it could have worked for both parties... if Mr. V knew how, or even wanted to run his own business, or even knew that he WAS running his own business. DM was instead having his cake and eating it too, by paying him joe wages, and expecting him to pay expenses, with none of the standard perks of being a regular employee.
If out of Mr. V's hourly wages, he had to spread that out to compensate for any vacation time, holiday pay, contributions to his CPP, sick pay, and everything else that a regular employee would be entitled to receive on TOP of his wages, he was probably comparatively making closer to minimum wage. It disgusts me, and yet DM's legal counsel is touting him as Mr. Generosity. Then on top, he publicly chastises him for having been 50 years old, and not knowing how much he owed DM. His head must have been SPINNING! Just wow.
And contrary to popular belief, if an employer sends an employee on a trip, of COURSE he's going to pay wages, on TOP of the expenses of the trip, on TOP of accommodations, fuel and food. I don't know anyone who would give up their personal/family life to go on a trip for their employer, for whatever reason, to whichever location, without compensation at least as above. And yet DM seems to be presented as being Mr. What-a-Great-Guy, just for paying the same as any other employer would be paying. SMH