Not sure what your own point of view is here? There is an obvious contradiction in the words of the officer. Can you or someone help: as far as I know there were only skeletal remains. How do they know she was alive when she fell and for that matter can they then tell us whether she was alive after she fell? Why are they separating out homicide or suspicious death here? I thought the category of suspicious death preceded and prompted an investigation of whether a death was natural or not.
Why did they close the highway after her death. Not to get the video obviously. I have always assumed they did some type of test to see if she could fall and land where she did. From what I saw of the scene it may have been too far from the bridge. They certainly did not discuss why they closed the bridge other than to mention video which of course had been taped over - they did not need to close the bridge to get that.
Why are they not suggesting she took her own life? What other possibilities are there? Hit by a car and tossed over the bridge? Surely not likely.
The article and quote I posted, IMO, is clear. It’s a death that appears to be a suicide, not a homicide, or natural death.
As a member of the public, you wouldn’t know exactly where the remains were found.
If you’re family, you could request access to that information if you do not already have it. (From my experience.)
Without knowing exactly where she landed the basic physics calculation, available online, may not be of much use to you (or us) in calculating where she would likely land based on the factors we know (the height of the overpass etc.)
More information: An Assessment of the Skeletal Fracture Patterns Resulting from Fatal High (˃3 m) Free Falls:
https://researchmgt.monash.edu/ws/portalfiles/portal/277371071/272192021_oa.pdf
More information about how they determine whether a person was alive or deceased from an apparent fall, by examining their skeletal remains, is also available online. (Similar to the type of document I posted above.)
There was construction on the overpass when she disappeared, iirc.
Taping off an area where remains are found and police are present is to be expected.
eta: typos
eta2: I don’t know where her father is at this point, but he attacked and seriously wounded people, and was diagnosed as having mental health challenges, especially related to this topic. No judgment, but I think it’s worth mentioning.
This is why I think facts really matter in this case versus speculation. The family by rights has access to information they need. The police have been as clear as they can be, with respect to the family’s privacy.