Case Against The Mccanns Is Strong

[IrishMist]

There where 2 younger children in that room that would be a better choice if you where looking for a "new child". The twin girl is as cute as a bugs ear, and only two. If you wanted to start a new family, without the worry of the kid "talking" wouldn't you choose the youngest one with limited language? (if you where a kidnapper)

The only abductor who would take an older girl vs a younger one, wants more than a new child...IMHO.

I can't tell you how much I hate to agree with this.

 

[docwho3]

There where 2 younger children in that room that would be a better choice if you where looking for a "new child". The twin girl is as cute as a bugs ear, and only two. If you wanted to start a new family, without the worry of the kid "talking" wouldn't you choose the youngest one with limited language? (if you where a kidnapper)

The only abductor who would take an older girl vs a younger one, wants more than a new child...IMHO.

I have only a minute or two to post (other things to do- bills to pay etc.) so here goes:
I have been thinking about the fact that only one out of three was taken and which one that was and why that happened that way. There are a few interesting possibilities.

1. A certain possible serial killer/serial kidnapper had apreference for children of a certain age range. (I read that case in news reports and it has been linked to this case.)

2. Parents did it and so no one was kidnapped and so no relation to why two were left alive.

3. . . . Durn - out of time - sorry will try to post more later tonight.

 

[ceeaura]

3. . . . Durn - out of time - sorry will try to post more later tonight.

Doggone it Doc,leave us hanging why don't ya

 

[narlacat]

There where 2 younger children in that room that would be a better choice if you where looking for a "new child". The twin girl is as cute as a bugs ear, and only two. If you wanted to start a new family, without the worry of the kid "talking" wouldn't you choose the youngest one with limited language? (if you where a kidnapper)

The only abductor who would take an older girl vs a younger one, wants more than a new child...IMHO.

An abductor who was rushing in all likelehood- he probably grabbed the first kid he saw-

Does anyone know if there are any pics of the room the kids were in?

 

[Rino]

An abductor who was rushing in all likelehood- he probably grabbed the first kid he saw-

Does anyone know if there are any pics of the room the kids were in?

 

[docwho3]

Doggone it Doc,leave us hanging why don't ya

Sorry I have run into a snag in the known facts about where Madeleine was actually sleeping and so I am having to research that and then I will have to rethink some of my conclusions. I had based some of my earlier thoughts on the alleged fact that Madeleine had slept on the same bed (all the children together) and inbetween the twins but that apparently has turned out to be incorrect.

This pic alleges to show the sleeping arrangements for the children.
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/09_03/mccanngraphicES2009_800x622.jpg


And this news article seems to agree with the picture (picture came from a different news place the daily mail.)
" . . .The other children, two-year-old twins Amelie and Shaun, were still asleep in their cots. . ."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/05/nmadel05.xml

So now I am rethinking some things that were based on that "in the middle" sleeping position which now seems to be very doubtful.

Soon as I have some things straight in my head I will post more on the subject but itmay take me awhile to let things percolate. Something about all that is on the edge of my thoughts and I need time to pluck that nagging almostthought out of thin air and hope it isn't something silly when I finally get it.

 

[Shazza]

Sorry I have run into a snag in the known facts about where Madeleine was actually sleeping and so I am having to research that and then I will have to rethink some of my conclusions. I had based some of my earlier thoughts on the alleged fact that Madeleine had slept on the same bed (all the children together) and inbetween the twins but that apparently has turned out to be incorrect.

This pic alleges to show the sleeping arrangements for the children.
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/09_03/mccanngraphicES2009_800x622.jpg


And this news article seems to agree with the picture (picture came from a different news place the daily mail.)
" . . .The other children, two-year-old twins Amelie and Shaun, were still asleep in their cots. . ."
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/05/05/nmadel05.xml

So now I am rethinking some things that were based on that "in the middle" sleeping position which now seems to be very doubtful.

Soon as I have some things straight in my head I will post more on the subject but itmay take me awhile to let things percolate. Something about all that is on the edge of my thoughts and I need time to pluck that nagging almostthought out of thin air and hope it isn't something silly when I finally get it.

Hey Doc, this is messing with a lot of our heads, it is like a jigsaw in my head and the pieces just wont fit together.

 

[Dr. Creepin]

The McCann's say they felt they were being watched and Gerry believes the kidnapper was hiding in the apartment when he checked the kids at 9:05pm. In their first interview with Sky News, they say the exact opposite! Make up your minds! They also state that they only thought about the horrors their daughter could be enduring, for a couuple of days, and then they regained hope! What garbage! Gruesome thoughts would continue to haunt you for the rest of your life!

http://youtube.com/jp.swf?video_id=N44SSvIcDvA&eurl=http%3A//ionglobaltrends.blogspot.com/search/label/Madeleine%2520McCann&iurl=http%3A//img.youtube.com/vi/N44SSvIcDvA/default.jpg&t=OEgsToPDskJ0oJvouMjSKTSOTnFPMdWU

 

[poco]

Sorry I have run into a snag in the known facts about where Madeleine was actually sleeping and so I am having to research that and then I will have to rethink some of my conclusions. I had based some of my earlier thoughts on the alleged fact that Madeleine had slept on the same bed (all the children together) and inbetween the twins but that apparently has turned out to be incorrect.

This pic alleges to show the sleeping arrangements for the children.
http://img.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2007/09_03/mccanngraphicES2009_800x622.jpg

Per this picture, assuming the intruder came in through the window - he would have had to have walked past two other sleeping children to get to the bed Madeleine was in. Was Madeleine already targeted by this intruder and WHY?

 

[pinto]

Per this picture, assuming the intruder came in through the window - he would have had to have walked past two other sleeping children to get to the bed Madeleine was in. Was Madeleine already targeted by this intruder and WHY?

This might sound flippant, and I don't mean it that way, but who in the world would want someone else's 2 year old? They're often kind of a handful, not potty trained, etc. I doubt you'd want to take that on when an easier-to-deal-with target was right there, too

And yes, it's very plausible that they were targeted, if this is what happened. Cute little girl, cute little trusting family, a routine followed at dinner every night where you know the kids are unattended for 15/30 min at a time ...

 

[docwho3]

. . .Per this picture, assuming the intruder came in through the window - he would have had to have walked past two other sleeping children to get to the bed Madeleine was in. Was Madeleine already targeted by this intruder and WHY?

You might want to look at the thread about someone who is alleged to have been looking for a blond little girl about that age to abduct and who was alleged to have been in algarve on vacation when Madeleine disappeared May. He had a history. And he was found suicided in july in switzerland after having kidnapped and killed a little blond 5 yr old and he had killed and buried her but the body was found when animal dug it up. He had been seen and had shot an adult just before suiciding, according to the article.
http://www.websleuths.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53662

Not saying for sure he did it but he is an obvious candidate.

Edited to add: Sorry, I did not come to this thread just to drive traffic to the other thread. I actually intended to discuss the sleeping position of the children as it relates to the topic of this thread and I still intend to do so when I finally get my thoughts straightened out about it all after the rethink.