Casey Anthony's defense wants prosecutors removed

[Searchfortruth]

Interesting that it was LKBaden that signed it.

I found it quite interesting too ! I wonder, maybe JB didn't want his name on this one ? Humm...

 

[ROBLYN]

It would seem that JB is trying to move the Jury pool in his favor. Bad LE...Bad SA...

Won't work imo, but geesh!!!

 

[Steely Dan]

The visual of the judge's reaction to this...o lord chamber break so he can laugh his honorable robe off.

:floorlaugh:

And what defense attorney doesn't want the prosecutors thrown off the case? Had to laugh at Nancy Grace, she said an attorney tried to have her removed for knowing too many facts about the case.

That is freakin hysterical!! :floorlaugh:

 

[mollie]

Heck, nothing would surprise me at this point. Who knows who filed the original complaint, but "if" I happened to be the parent of such a child on trial, watching JB, being barred from access to my daughter, hearing about these "sources" of possible monetary deals, feeling more and more every day that he might not have "my" daughter's best interest at heart, I'd use every resource at hand to remove him. Just saying...

 

[Noddy]

JB obviously has quite a bit of free time, filing all his ridiculous motions. Just shows how weak his case is. He has nothing productive to do or investigate.

All the investigation is being done for him. Best Defence is an Offence. As Nancy Grace says, the prosecution can't say a word but the defence can throw anything and everything out there.

I don't know how to do a bold by me but that was a bold by me in your statement :blowkiss:

 

[SoCalSleuth]

Every attorney has an ethical obligation to report ethical violations to the State Bar, including the attorneys at the SA's office. That Florida made the reporting of such violations anonymous is irrelevant to the issue. As an aside, that someone told Eyewitness news something --a quote that is not cited to the actual source BTW-is not a proper matter for judicial notice. This guy is a bozo. I wonder how much more of this tripe the judge will put up with before he starts sanctioning JB for frivolous motions.

 

[Spangle]

Every attorney has an ethical obligation to report ethical violations to the State Bar, including the attorneys at the SA's office. That Florida made the reporting of such violations anonymous is irrelevant to the issue. As an aside, that someone told Eyewitness news something --a quote that is not cited to the actual source BTW-is not a proper matter for judicial notice. This guy is a bozo. I wonder how much more of this tripe the judge will put up with before he starts sanctioning JB for frivolous motions.

Which might be why JB had someone else file it.

 

[tasylshari]

Gonna get me one of them voodoo dolls!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Giddyup, Casey!!!!!!

 

[panthera]

I found it quite interesting too ! I wonder, maybe JB didn't want his name on this one ? Humm...

Maybe he had her sign it so as not to make too many enemies in Orange County ~ since she doesn't live or practice law there. MOO

 

[TxRose]

Which might be why JB had someone else file it.

That and the fact that he didn't want to sound like he was whining about how they treated him....even though he is. LOL.

 

[alwaysonmymind]

I don't guess I've EVER heard of this being done. Has it ever been done? I mean has the defense on any case ever been able to have the prosecution removed? I swear, I just sit here and shake my head, searching for words to accurately describe how freakin' insane this entire case is. There are none.

I know of one case...

http://blogs.dallasobserver.com/unfairpark/2007/10/a_very_trying_capital_murder_c.php

This guy is charged with capital murder of his parents. The district attorney's office was taping his phone calls---even the ones with his defense attorney.

These prosecutors HAD actually done something to be removed for. They eventually asked to be removed.

 

[Trapshooter]

In the words of my dearest friend, The Honorable Greg Matney, "there's an hour you can't get back". This will be what Strickland is saying after hearing JB's ridiculous argument!

 

[beckaroozie]

This seems like a "be careful what you ask for" situation to me.

8.If the Court feels it does not have enough prima facie materials to order reclusal at this point, it has the authority to further order a hearing and allow the agents of the Prosecutors Office to be placed on the stand under oath and be cross examined in this matter.

I would so love to see this hearing be ordered. This would open the door to the SA to expose all the nefarious activities of PCM, reveal who is really paying Todd B and investigate any deals made to profit from the case.
Did I mention that I would so love for this hearing to be ordered?

The funny thing is if it IS granted, it may well wind up like his COUNTER SUIT in the Civil case. Hahahaha Opens a whole nother can o' worms....JB's feet must look like swiss cheese he's shot them up so much. Guess he'll have to work on his rear next.

 

[panthera]

I'm curious ~ if LKB signed & filed this motion doesn't she have to argue it before the court? If so, this should be good! MOO

 

[ThoughtElf]

Now, who wanted a gag order a while back? Wasn't that the SA? And didn't defense argue against that?

Oh ya, they did.

Guess they forgot in all the confusion of creatively hiding their own sources and PR connections.

 

[Trapshooter]

Now, who wanted a gag order a while back? Wasn't that the SA? And didn't defense argue against that?

Oh ya, they did.

Guess they forgot in all the confusion of creatively hiding their own sources and PR connections.

:clap::clap::clap:

 

[SoCalSleuth]

I'm curious ~ if LKB signed & filed this motion doesn't she have to argue it before the court? If so, this should be good! MOO

No, but it makes one wonder why a forensic specialist retained attorney is filing a recusal motion. I can guarantee you an attorney did not draft this motion--it is absurd.

 

[countzero]

Every attorney has an ethical obligation to report ethical violations to the State Bar, including the attorneys at the SA's office. That Florida made the reporting of such violations anonymous is irrelevant to the issue. As an aside, that someone told Eyewitness news something --a quote that is not cited to the actual source BTW-is not a proper matter for judicial notice. This guy is a bozo. I wonder how much more of this tripe the judge will put up with before he starts sanctioning JB for frivolous motions.

Your post hit before I could finish typing. You are so correct on the sanctions path. JB needs to find a mentor who knows when you file a motion and when to just keep quiet and one who can actually talk some common sense as well as pointing out legal strategies to JB.

As to the sanctions, I feel the courts will be somewhat lenient towards JB on these at first. JB might be pulled into chambers and counseled and reminded not to waste the courts time. If that does happen and JB still maintains his right as counsel to file frivolous motions, then the sanctions will be handed out swiftly and firmly.

This case will not go to trial for at least another 16 months or longer. That gives JB either enough rope to hang himself career wise or to learn the system, shut up and do his job.

 

[countzero]

Which might be why JB had someone else file it.

That and the fact that he didn't want to sound like he was whining about how they treated him....even though he is. LOL.

Doesn't matter whos name is on the motion. JB is lead attorney and ultimately responsible for any correspondence which is disseminated from his firm. He cannot play the name blame game.

 

[fay]

Well here's an understatement from the motion, "...which paints the Defendant in a negative light."
Gee, ya think? Is Casey writing her own motions, because whoever wrote this nonsence must not have been keeping up with things in the real world.
Negative light, how about, "JB the public is way past seeing your client is negative light and in case you haven't noticed, the public hates your client and wants the death penalty" What planet is this guy from? :rage: