Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
lisafremont said:I wrote to Catherine Crier:
<<Sorry, Catherine. I am completely convinced that the so-called "ransom letter" was written by Patsy Ramsey. It was written IN THE HOUSE and it is completely incredible that an intruder would do that. AND the handwriting matches Patsy's and contains words and information that could only be hers.
Why on earth would Patsy write a letter to cover up for an intruder? She wouldn't. BUT she would do it to cover up for a Ramsey.
It's a shame that JonBenet will never have justice. But in my opinion there was NO intruder.>>
An intruder is completely inconsistent with the "ransom letter."
sissi said:I just caught the end of Abrams, and it "appeared" he was discussing the case of the girl in Jonbenet's dance school, not certain, but it seemed this case was more similar than we were told?
Catherine Crier should believe you over SIX handwriting examiners who all concluded it was EXTREMELY UNLIKELY Patsy wrote the RN? As the Dan Rather incident shows, news organizations that play fast and loose with the truth eventually are going to get burned. You can rest assured that 48 Hours is reaching the conclusion they have because they have carefully looked at the WEIGHT OF THE EVIDENCE in this case. You are 100% correct in your assumption that PR wouldn't have covered for an intruder, but 100% wrong in assuming she wrote RNlisafremont said:I wrote to Catherine Crier:
<<Sorry, Catherine. I am completely convinced that the so-called "ransom letter" was written by Patsy Ramsey. It was written IN THE HOUSE and it is completely incredible that an intruder would do that. AND the handwriting matches Patsy's and contains words and information that could only be hers.
Why on earth would Patsy write a letter to cover up for an intruder? She wouldn't. BUT she would do it to cover up for a Ramsey.
It's a shame that JonBenet will never have justice. But in my opinion there was NO intruder.>>
An intruder is completely inconsistent with the "ransom letter."
DocWatson said:Catherine Crier should believe you over SIX handwriting examiners who all concluded it was EXTREMELY UNLIKELY Patsy wrote the RN?
lisafremont said:I understood that the official handwriting expert said that he COULDN'T RULE PATSY OUT. I have seen an analysis of the language of the letter which to me is obviously from Patsy and of the handwriting side by side with an exemplar of Patsy's hand and it is totally obviously HERS.
And that's not all the evidence that convinces me. The pineapple and the Hi-Tek boot print all tell me: no intruder. It was a cover-up.
Except that DNA can co-mingle even if deposited at different times. If I bled onto a hankerchief and it dried and then you bled onto the existing bloodstains on the same hankerchief then what would be extracted would be a mixed DNA sample - i.e. co-mingled blood.sissi said:The "official" report said she likely didn't write the note.
I believe the foreign dna comingled in her blood can point no where else but toward an intruder.
lisafremont said:I understood that the official handwriting expert said that he COULDN'T RULE PATSY OUT. I have seen an analysis of the language of the letter which to me is obviously from Patsy and of the handwriting side by side with an exemplar of Patsy's hand and it is totally obviously HERS.
And that's not all the evidence that convinces me. The pineapple and the Hi-Tek boot print all tell me: no intruder. It was a cover-up.
lisafremont said:I wrote to Catherine Crier:
<<Sorry, Catherine. I am completely convinced that the so-called "ransom letter" was written by Patsy Ramsey. It was written IN THE HOUSE and it is completely incredible that an intruder would do that. AND the handwriting matches Patsy's and contains words and information that could only be hers.
Hi AK,As far as words and phrases that could only be Patsy's--are you a personal friend of hers? How would you know what words and phrases she uses?
Karen
Sprocket said:Hi AK,
You know you and I disagree on this case.
But I will shed some light onto what lisafremont is refering to. Don Foster, renound linguist was the one who compared Patsy's prior and post writings, to the ransom note. He is the one who says, the phrasing, style, language and even the way she wrote on the pad is consistent with her other writings.
AuntieKaren said:Right, I don't agree with him whatsoever. Patsy is not a stupid woman. Again, I see no similarities at all to the handwriting. She'd have to be the dumbest woman on the planet to have written that letter.
Karen
Sprocket said:Hi AK,
You know you and I disagree on this case.
But I will shed some light onto what lisafremont is refering to. Don Foster, renound linguist was the one who compared Patsy's prior and post writings, to the ransom note. He is the one who says, the phrasing, style, language and even the way she wrote on the pad is consistent with her other writings.
That doesn't mean you have to agree with Professor Foster though.