:crazy: I know...same questions I have had - just tryin' to be the debbil.
I know. I understand completely. That's usually MY job!
:crazy: I know...same questions I have had - just tryin' to be the debbil.
I'm sorry, the fact that she took the truck specifically to pick-up the project and then made no attempt to do so just. stikes. me. wrong. And no, I don't consider the email an attempt. Terri knew she could get the project at some point in the day and did not. As I said earlier, she could have been there at the end of the school day if her concern was disrupting the class.
I had always thought that Terri intended to stay at school until 10, perhaps escorting a group, then picking up the project. But Baby became uncomfortable with teething (per Kaine), so she left. Anyone who has ever had a cranky toddler knows that they have to be catered to, for the sake of all within earshot.
I'm sorry, the fact that she took the truck specifically to pick-up the project and then made no attempt to do so just. stikes. me. wrong. And no, I don't consider the email an attempt. Terri knew she could get the project at some point in the day and did not. As I said earlier, she could have been there at the end of the school day if her concern was disrupting the class.
C. Y. A.
Yes, they bear responsibility, regardless of whether or not Terri was involved. They should have had a sign out procedure in place, as well as a parent call-in procedure for children who are not coming to school at all.
There should have been a process in place whereby when the teacher's roll hit the office, somebody compared the ones marked 'absent' against the sign out sheet, and list of students whose parents had called them in sick.
Any student not accounted for should have immediately had a call home, and if the parents can't be reached, then a call to 911 to report the child missing unless/until they're accounted for.
It seems to me that's just common sense to protect the children for whom you are legally (I'll leave out morally) responsible.
wasn't really sure where to put this..so here it is.. figure i could tie my ?? loosely in as it states a procedure review in place at Skyline in mid june...
Earlier this evening i decided to go through old notes i had taken to see if anything stood out as a lot of those earlier articles are no longer available or have been edited. I came across this with a question mark attached and reading it now i still have the question. In the neighbourhood association website they had updates (where to donate money, food for searchers, what the community could do to help etc) However this link on what to do about the media struck me as really odd at the time as it started off as i spoke with the sheriff regarding talking to the media then a disclaimer that the following was not Le advice but continues as if it were info relayed.
snip
"Cindy Banks (owner Brooks Hill Historic Church) offers the following knowledgable suggestions regarding talking with the press:
June 15, 2010
I talked to the sheriff’s office today and asked about the relationship between the media and people in our neighborhood. The sheriff's office expressed their sympathy for impact this event has had on the neighborhood and they understand how sad and how intrusive this has been for everyone. They understand that people need to talk about their feelings and experience. They do no discourage anyone from talking about how they feel or talking to whoever they want to talk to in the press.
These are my thoughts about what would be helpful. These are my personal opinions, these are not guidelines from the Sheriff’s office.
The sheriff’s office said that it IS helpful to keep Kyron’s name in the news. Please feel free to cooperate with the media to any extent you feel comfortable. If the media doesn’t have anything to report, there is less chance of keeping his name in the news.
http://srnpdx.org/media
All of it struck me as odd a the time but this one statement on the do not discuss list is where i had this question mark
snip
"It would be appreciated if you could avoid negative comments about the school and law enforcement. A complete review of procedures and responses are being reviewed in both place"
Now a review of procedures at the school would seem obvious but why LE? And why would this even be put out there?? I see them trying to encourage people to be positive in the media but why go on to state a review is taking place in both places??
Any ideas???