Same article as above.
If they were not killed by an animal but by a scalpel then the expert who examined the bodies for the state (meaning on the side of the prosecution) should have been able to figure that out.
But the expert said they were killed by an animal and not by a human.Many times experts for defense and the prosecution disagree but in this case the experts for defense and prosecution agree these cats were killed by an animal and not human-so clearly there is no case whatsoever against this kid.