As has been hashed over time and time again on these threads, most of the evidence that LE have, that we have been made privy to by way of MSM, is circumstantial. And likely there is more that we are not privy too, such as yesterday's video footage, but again it is still all likely circumstantial. A case with mostly or only circumstantial evidence is very hard to try and get a conviction for. Doesn't mean the person is not responsible, it just means that they've done a good job of keeping forensic evidence out of the equation. But they all make a mistake or two. Which is where the circumstantial stuff starts building up. A good defense attorney however (and he has the best) will try to turn every piece of circumstantial evidence around to reasonable doubt as seems to be the case here on these boards at times. He will obfusticate everything to where there is no clear common sense conclusion for all of this circumstantial evidence to some jurors. It is what they do and some do it very well.
That is why he has been named the prime suspect but has not yet been charged. One piece of good direct evidence to tie it all together is what they need to guarantee a conviction. Or maybe one person with a conscience who knows what happened to come forward. And it appears at the moment the DA is not willing to proceed without it. On that point we can agree. And maybe they will never get it and the case will never be tried. Lucky for DSJr then right? Let's hope that the next girlfriend/fiancé/wife gets out alive then. But it's not the responsibility of posters on a message board to go out and find that evidence even though some locals have tried and god bless them for their efforts. Nor should we be harassing the LE agency who is responsible for this case. We can go over the circumstantial evidence and anything else pertaining to the PRIME SUSPECT that might point us in the direction of where that PRIME SUSPECT may have travelled that afternoon/evening, or perhaps an accomplice, and disposed of Michelle Parker. And if we come up with something that seems to have some real potential, anyone is free to call it in to the proper tip lines.
What there is absolutely no evidence of, circumstantial or otherwise, is that Michelle Parker drove away from that condo, at any time after 3:18pm, of her own free will and met with an unknown assailant(s).
MOO
Oh Ok "the significant amount of circumstantial evidence that needs just that last piece of evidence"
theory which in turn subliminally and not so subliminally puts forth a narrative that DS's guilt is a given and when those prosecutors get a bit more confident about their chances at convincing a jury ...
and I hope that was the case and I've been entertaining that possibility for the good part of two years and unfortunately, from my point of view, all of that is taken from
I don't know where because I can't find anything even remotely resembling that on the public record, and I can only deal with facts I know when faced with things that either are or are not as a matter of fact when
demonstrated not before.
Ultimately it seems to me that your position is that either DS is clearly involved here and it will be proven or
if not proven that is only because he had been very
cunning,
either way your theory is correct and therefore there are no possibilities that you're actually wrong about it and DS is not involved after all, in other words heads or tails same result where your own beliefs are the issue, I will concede then that
for what I know you might be right after all but, as it always was the case, there is not much of a point arguing that which the other has for a given and that's that.
But enough of what has been argued over and over for two years and as I said
I hope you're right and, as per my example above, even a flip of a coin is roughly correct fifty percent of the time, but my concern is not at this point in arguing endlessly what the police might or might not have as far as evidence go, if they have what it takes to solve this case they'll prove it, gonna have to, and
what they'll prove or not is out of my hands in terms of their investigative efforts, all I know that as of today they clearly can't prove it, and being that two years have gone past without finding
Michelle or prosecuting anyone for her disappearance, then to me it's
not an issue of what I might be convinced of or not and strategically speaking I'd think it's best to assume the worst and perhaps be pleasantly surprised by the best
not somewhat the other way around ...
...
so ... as far as what I believe really matters ....
...
we now know the H3 stopped at Vineland and Conroy at 8:55pm, so
who commutes along that stretch of a road regularly around that time or was traveling along that road? ? No cars may have been visible at that exact time and precise location alongside the H3 but what about a bit further down the road?
How about volunteers handing out flyers with pictures of the H3, Michelle, DS and whomever and whatever one might think of, along that stretch of the road?
And why the police did not disclose this information a long time ago so this could have been done when it might have been much more effective or worse, altogether feasible, is incomprehensible to me at this time.
JMO
